The Cosmology Of
The Gospels
Is The
Scriptures Myth?
Or Are We
Ignorant Of
Their True
Purpose?
When we instruct
elementary
school students,
we present the
information in
an age and
grade-level
appropriate
manner. We
would not even
attempt to teach
elementary
school students
physics,
trigonometry,
and calculus at
an age level
where they must
first learn
basic math. And
that the
consciousness of
organic
(natural) man is
in fact
embryonic, and
is too immature
and undeveloped to
comprehend the
higher reality
of the Soul and
the spiritual
meaning of the
scriptures, is
why Paul warned
that the
quasi-historical account
of Jesus and the
crucifixion is
"milk"
designed
for
"babes in
Christ"
(see
http://AnInconvenientTruth.org#animal
) -- wherein he
warned that if
he even
attempted to
convey the
Higher Truth to
the baptized and
confirmed
Christians who
he personally
taught and
instructed, that
they would
reject the
spiritual
meaning of the
Gospels as utter
"foolishness".
Why? Because
the mind of
organic man
is very much an
embryonic-seed
that must be
sown in what is
portrayed in the
parable of the
Sower and the
Seed as the
"good ground"
that brings
forth fruit in
the form of the
Divine Manna
that mentally
expands and
spiritually
deepens the mind
of the sincere
seeker beyond
organic human
levels of
consciousness.
Therefore,
without this
necessary
transformational
process, the
spiritual
meaning of the
scriptures and
the higher
reality of the
Soul remains beyond
the organic
limitations of
natural human
comprehension.
And the fact
that not only
the Church, but
also modern
scholars ignore
this warning, is
the cause of our
self-imposed
ignorance of our
own higher
Soul-Reality.
Further, in the
same way that
certain
conditions must
be present for a
seed to
germinate,
sprout and begin
to grow, the
body/mind of man
is portrayed as
earthen-ground
in the parable
of the Sower and
the Seed,
because of its
impact upon the
development of
the
embryonic-seed
that has been
planted therein.
And when rightly
understood, there is an
ultra-important
equation to the
process of
mental-expansion
and
spiritual-deepening
-- an equation
that is
crucial for
deep thought vs
shallow rote
programming.
And because
modern academia
does not at all
understand how
to bring about
the expansion
and deepening of
mind beyond
embryonic human
limitations, our
whole system of
education
anchors the
students to
self-ignorance.
Who Are We?
What Are We?
From Where Did
We Come? What Is
Our Ultimate
Destiny?
Only a handful
of people today
can answer these
all-important
crucial
questions
correctly! The
rest dwell under
the cloud of
unknowing. What
do you actually
know about
yourself from
the perspective
of the axiom:
Know Thyself?
When rightly
understood, the
Gospels are not
historical
accounts as most
people
erroneously
believe and
assume -- but
rather, the
Gospels possess
embedded
symbolism and
catalysts that
use a
developmental-equation
to bring about
the
transformational
mental-expansion
and
spiritual-deepening
that evolves the
mind to levels
of Wholeness and
Completion.
How important is
it to achieve a
condition of
Wholeness?
In the words of
Jesus:
"They that
are whole have
no need of the
physician, but
they that are
sick: I came not
to call the
righteous, but
sinners to
repentance"
(Mark 2:17).
Which provokes
the question: If
the objective of
the life we
are living is to
achieve
Wholeness
, then how is
this Wholeness
achieved?
Contrary to the
dogma of the
modern Church,
if Jesus is the
savior who every
person needs for
salvation, then
Jesus himself
said the Church
was wrong, and
those who are
Whole do not
need him.
Therefore, as a
physician, Jesus
did not come for
the salvation of
those who are
Whole,
but only for
those who are
sick and in need
of a
physician. And
in total
opposition to
Church dogma,
what this also
means is that at
the time the
historical man
Jesus walked the
face of the
earth, there
existed people
who he portrayed
as
"whole [and]
righteous"
who did not need
a physician.
Jesus openly
states that his
mission as a
spiritual
physician is not
for them,
because they
achieved the
necessary
Wholeness
without him.
Which raises the
question: Does everyone
need Jesus as
the modern
Christian
maintains?
While Jesus
himself said
that those who
had achieved
Wholeness did
not need him as
a spiritual
physician --
i.e.,
They that are
whole have no
need of the
physician..."
--
and that with
effort, all of
mankind is
capable of
achieving a
condition that
Jesus portrayed
as
"whole [and]
righteous",
which means that
these people who
did achieve
Wholeness, were
not sick, and in
Jesus' own words
were not in need
of him (Jesus)
as a physician
to heal them.
Which means that
(1) not
only is the
whole foundation
of modern Church
dogma man-made
and in error;
(2) that
blind belief in
quasi-historical
accounts cannot
achieve the
necessary
Wholeness
required;
(3) that
the Gospels
provide a
totally
different
purpose than
what is commonly
believed today.
In order for the
developmental-equation
to properly
function and
bring about a
condition of
wholeness, the
embedded symbols
and catalysts
must be
presented in a
useable format
that can be
embraced in the
daily lives of
the
"babes in
Christ"
that Paul warns
are
incomprehensible
to man's organic
embryonic
consciousness.
Therefore, the
Gospels were
intentionally
created with an
historical
facade that
could be
intimately
embraced by
individuals and
groups of
serious seekers.
Without the
historical
facade of the
literal text of
the scriptures,
the crucial
developmental-equation
could not be put
into place where
the symbols and
catalysts were
able to properly
function in the
development of
the mind of the
seeker.
The word
EDUCATE: is
derived from the
Latin,
“educare,”
and it means
“to draw out
that which lies
within.”
Yet, because we
are totally
ignorant of what
can be portrayed
as the Cosmology
of Mind and
Being, we
attempt to
educate by using
rote programming
on the young
minds of
students --
thereby
inflicting
almost
irreversible
harm when we
suppress and
atrophie those
areas of mind
that are
necessary to
develop in order
to tap into the
Inner Source of
Knowledge within
us -- i.e., at
the Core of our
Mind and Being.
Further, our
systems of
education
inhibits
religious people
from
understanding
and embracing
the core New
Covenant
teachings --
inhibiting them
from receiving
the Divine Manna
that is
essential in
fulfilling the
very purpose of
the life that we
are presently
living (see The
Divine Manna -
The Gospels -
The foundation
of the New
Covenant
http://BrotherOfJesus.org#NewCovenant
). An example
of this fact is
presented by the
author and
visionary Philip
K. Dick who
developed the
ability to
recall his
Soul's life as a
first century
Christian, where
he wrote with
respect to the
original
disciples of
Jesus that:
"Christ
...taught his
followers how to
enter the
kingdom while
still alive,
where other
mystery
religions only
bring about
amnesis:
knowledge of it
at the 'other
time' in 'the
other realm,'
not here. He
causes it to
come here, and
is the living
agency to the
Sole Good God
(i.e. the
Logos)."
This is true --
and that the
original Gospel
message was to
develop the mind
through the
transformative
process of
expansion and
deepening of
consciousness,
and then enable
the disciple of
TheWay to gain
entrance into
the Inner
Kingdom, is
easily
demonstrated at
the subheading:
The Third Fatal
Mistake - Not
Proving The
Truth.
Without
understanding
the Cosmology of
Mind -- i.e.,
the blueprint of
interacting
Spheres of
opposite
polarities of
the Mind --
including the
Laws and Forces
of Consciousness
that must be
nourished and
evolved to
support
Wholeness -- the
developmental-equation
and
transformative
mental-expansion
and
spiritual-deepening
cannot be
brought about.
Resulting in a
mental
flat-lining that
Paul portrays as
"animal-consciousness"
that is
incapable of
Higher
Comprehension
and
Self-Knowledge
(see
Animal/Organic
Consciousness).
Ordinary levels
of human
consciousness is
often portrayed
as the product
of the ego-self
-- the
lower-self --
the earthly-self
-- which means
that human
consciousness is
a projection of
a deeper level
of Higher-Self
that the person
we are in this
world remains
ignorant and
separated from.
When author and
visionary Philip
K. Dick uses the
term
"amnesis"
(see Anamnesis -
Innate Knowledge
Of The Truth Of
All Truths:
http://AnInconvenientTruth.org#Innate
), what he
portrayed was an
elementary level
of Soul-Memory
that many
spiritual
systems were
able to achieve.
In
contradistinction
to these groups
which he called
"mystery
religions",
the disciples of
Jesus were able
embrace the
Gospel teachings
and actually
enter the
Kingdom within.
But what this
also means is
that the mind of
an infant is not
empty -- but
rather, is full
-- and therefore
the person you
are in this
world must learn
and acquire the
ability to tap
into and even
connect with
your Inner or
True-Self.
When the wise
men of the past
used the adage
to
"Know
Thyself",
they used this
term to portray
that reality of
Self that is
beyond the
embryonic
shadow-image of
human
consciousness
that is
projected into
this world from
a Higher Source
of Mind and
Being. Our
True-Self that
the adage to
Know Thyself
portrays, is a
twelve-dimensional
Being of Higher
Mind -- whereas,
organic man can
be rightly
portrayed as a
three-dimensional
seed-projection
of our True-Self
that must
mentally evolve
through the
process of
expansion,
deepening and
spiritual
evolution.
In the parable
of the
Sower and the
Seed, the
person must
become what is
portrayed as the
"good ground"
in order to make
any progress and
advancement.
The wise men and
women of our
distant past
knew this -- and they were
able acquire
self-knowledge,
and to
accomplish this
manifestation of
their True-Self,
because they
understood the
Cosmology of
Mind and the
Laws and Forces
of Consciousness
-- i.e.,
"Jesus said,
...But if you
will not know
yourselves, you
dwell in poverty
and it is you
who are that
poverty".
And this
condition of
intellectual
poverty that is
being made note
of in the
Gospel, is the
result of man's
failure to Know
Thyself -- i.e.,
his True-Self
that cannot
manifest in the
physical body
without the
necessary
development of
mind.
If
what Paul and
the other Gospel
Authors stated
is true, and
there exist
higher realities
and dimensions
of being that
are totally
inconceivable to
the mind of the
undeveloped
faith-based
believer -- and
by virtue of the
undeveloped
immaturity of
the faith-based
believers
brought about by
an embryonic
condition of
mind which Paul
portrayed as the
"natural"
mind of man --
and the
limitations of
this embryonic
condition of
mind even
inhibited Jesus
from conveying
the true meaning
of the
scriptures, and
the higher
reality of the
soul and the
Kingdom to all
but his inner
core of
disciples (see
In The House -
Taught In
Parables) --
which means that
the biblical
authors were
therefore
powerless to
explain in
detail many of
the most
important Gospel
teachings and
concepts in the
literal text of
the New
Testament --
then the
spiritually
mature author's
of the
scriptures who
were themselves
enlightened to
these higher
realities,
remained
virtually
powerless to do
anything more
than to provide
the people with
a list of do's
and don'ts -- so
that the
faith-based
believers will
be in a position
where they will
be better able
to evolve to a
mature
understanding
and
comprehension of
the teachings of
Jesus and TheWay.
To totally
ignore these
do's and don'ts,
without knowing
the consequence
of one's choices
and actions, is
paramount to
walking out onto
a freeway
blindfolded.
The Gospels
teach that there
are two ways --
portrayed as the
"broad-way"
and
the
"narrow"
path into Life.
To understand
the Two Ways and
the difference
between the New
and Old
Covenants, one
must understand
the two
foundational
paradigms of
human
consciousness --
which is based
upon the
premise: Is an
infant's mind
empty and in
need of being
filled with the
wisdom and
knowledge of
mankind? Or, is
every infant an
extension of an
inner
un-manifest
source of mind
and
consciousness
that many
portray as our
True or
Soul-Self -- who
is itself an
expression of
the Logos (Mind
of God a.k.a. Son
of God), and
s/he must learn
and acquire the
ability to tap
into this Inner
Source of Higher
Mind and Being?
The
Gospels state:
"I worship
the God of our
fathers As a
follower of The
Way"
(Acts 24:14 NIV).
Jesus taught
those who follow
in TheWay as his
disciples must:
"Enter by the
narrow gate; for
wide is the gate
and broad is the
way that leads
to destruction,
and there are
many who go in
by it. Because
narrow is the
gate and
difficult is the
way which leads
to life, and
there are few
who find it"
(Matt
7:13-14 NKJ).
Thus, the
dividing point
between the Two
Ways is seen in
the fact that
there is no
"narrow gate"
that one can
enter in the
outer world.
Why? Because
the
"narrow gate"
is within you --
and the whole
focus and
objective of the
New Covenant is
to guide the
followers of
Jesus into the
"narrow gate"
by achieving the
next stage of
birth, and
gaining entrance
into the Kingdom
within. The
Pharisees who
looked for the
Kingdom of God
to come upon the
earth, asked
him: If you are
the Messiah,
when would you
inaugurate the
Kingdom?
And when would
the Kingdom come
upon the earth?
"And when he
was demanded of
the Pharisees,
when the kingdom
of God should
come, he
answered them
and said, The
kingdom of God
comes not with
observation:
Neither shall
they say, See
here! or, see
there! for,
behold, the
kingdom of God
is within you"
(Luke
17:20-21). And
what this means
is that ONLY
when the the
Original Gospel
Teachings are
intimately
followed and
embraced (see
http://OriginalGospel.Ebionite.com
) -- and the
Gospels used as
the Key of
Knowledge by
turning them
within the
believer's own
mind and being
(see The End
Times -
Armageddon/Rapture
(see The
Application Of
The Key Of
Knowledge
http://KeyOfKnowledge.org#ApplicationOfTheKeyOfKnowledge
) -- can the
next stage of
birth be
achieved, and
the objectives
of the Gospel be
manifest in what
is allegorically
portrayed as the
End Times
(see The Coming Of
The Kingdom
http://TreeOfLife.Nazirene.org#EndTimes
).
That Jesus
expected his
followers to
enter in at the
"narrow
strait gate",
and gain
entrance into
the Inner
Kingdom, is
demonstrated in
his condemnation
of the Jews as
"blind
guides"
-- i.e.,
"How terrible
it will be for
you experts in
religious law!
For you hide the
key to knowledge
from the people.
You don't enter
the Kingdom
yourselves, and
you prevent
others from
entering"
(Luke 11:52).
Thus, in
understanding
these words
spoken to the
Pharisees, the
questions must
be asked: How
did the
Pharisees and
Jewish
authorities
"...hide the
key to knowledge
from the people"?
Why did Jesus
condemn the
leaders of the
Jews for failing
to enter the
Kingdom
themselves? --
i.e.,
"...You don't
enter the
Kingdom
yourselves"!
And how did the
religious
leaders of the
Jews
"...prevent
others from
entering?"
In further
clarification,
the TEV version
of the this
verse states:
“How terrible
for you teachers
of the Law! You
have kept the
key that opens
the door to the
house of
knowledge; you
yourselves will
not go in, and
you stop those
who are trying
to go in!”
(Luke 11:52 TEV).
Thus, the
scriptures when
properly used,
have the ability
to
"open the
[inner] door to
the House of
Knowledge"
-- and their
outward
interpretations
whereby they
seek the Kingdom
to come
outwardly (see
The End Times -
Armageddon/Rapture
- The Coming Of
The Kingdom
http://TreeOfLife.Nazirene.org#EndTimes
), inhibits
believers from
"going in
[the Hose of
Knowledge]"
-- and by
teaching the
people their
outward
interpretations,
they inhibited
the community of
believers from
entering the
Hose of
Knowledge.
That the primary
objective of the
Gospel is to
prepare and
enable the
seeker/disciple
to enter the
Kingdom, is
further
demonstrated in
Jesus'
condemnation of
the blind
religious
leaders as seen
in the words:
"Woe to you,
teachers of the
law and
Pharisees, you
hypocrites! You
shut the kingdom
of heaven in
men's faces. You
yourselves do
not enter, nor
will you let
those enter who
are trying to"
(Matt 23:13 NIV).
Which means that
the Kingdom of
God is not
something that
will come if we
wait for it --
but rather, it
is a reality
which man must
seek and find --
within himself.
Before you can
begin to utilize
the scriptures
as the Key of
Knowledge, you
must first come
to terms with
the reality that
you must begin
to develop those
inward-looking
Intuitive
(feminine)
spheres of mind
that is able to
tap into the
Source of
Knowledge within
you.
The foundation
of The New
Covenant is set
forth in the
words -- i.e.,
"For this is
the covenant
that I will make
with the house
of Israel after
those days, says
the Lord: I will
put My laws in
their mind and
write them on
their hearts;
and I will be
their God, and
they shall be My
people. None of
them shall teach
his neighbor,
and none his
brother, saying,
'Know the Lord,'
for all shall
know Me, from
the least of
them to the
greatest of
them"
(Heb 8:10-11 NKJ).
Yet, the
Christian world
has rejected the
very foundation
and tenets of
the New Covenant
by virtue of
countless
teachers, Bible
Commentaries, a
mass of Bible
interpretations
and the adoption
of man-made
dogma that
inhibits the
believer's
spiritual
advancement.
What this means
is that if your
mind has been
dominated by the
outward-looking
linear spheres
of mind --
studying many
books --
listening to
many teachers --
then those
inward-looking
intuitive
spheres of mind
have been
suppressed and
even atrophied.
Unless you are
at least willing
to seek and find
out if there is
an inner Source
of knowledge,
then it will
remain
impossible for
you to begin to
tap into what
you reject the
existence of.
Therefore, the
application of
the scriptures
as the Key of
Knowledge (see
http://TreeOfLife.org
), means that
you are turning
the scriptures
within your own
Mind and Being
in order to
travail the
"narrow"
path of the New
Covenant --
entering within
your own
consciousness
through the
"narrow
strait gate"
-- and
gain entrance
into the Inner
Kingdom while
still physically
alive in the
body -- thereby
fulfilling the
requirement to
be a
"poor one"
(Ebionite) to
the ways and
thinking of this
world. If, on
the other hand,
you attempt to
read the
scriptures
outwardly -- as
portraying
historical
events that
transpired in
the past -- then
you are reading
the Gospels in
an Old Covenant
Mode from the
perspective of a
spiritually
flat-lined
mindset in the
manner of the
Pharisees who
were portrayed
as
"blind
guides"
who threw away
the Key of
Knowledge
The Four Gates
Of The Mind:
The ancients
understood that
the mind of man
has what can be
portrayed as
four (4) Gates
-- each of which
must be
independently
developed to
function
together to
bring about
Wholeness in the
Center.
The mind of man
can look
outwardly
through the
Linear (male)
spheres of mind
-- look inwardly
through the
Intuitive
(feminine)
spheres of mind
-- upward into
the heavenly
spheres of mind
through such
things as
meditation --
or, allow one's
mind to be
controlled by
the person's
lower earthly
carnal nature
(see Organic Man
Ruled Over By
His Lower Animal
Nature
http://SoulSelf.org#AnimalNature
). The
"narrow gate"
can only be
entered through
the Center --
and only by
bringing the
Mind into a
condition of
Wholeness --
i.e.,
"They that
are whole have
no need of the
physician, but
they that are
sick: I came not
to call the
righteous, but
sinners to
repentance"
(Mark 2:17).
Before this
verse can be
understood, we
must first
understand what
it means to be
Whole.
Which provokes
the question:
How is
Wholeness
achieved?
Contrary to the
dogma of the
modern Church,
if Jesus is the
savior who every
person needs for
salvation, then
Jesus himself
said the Church
was wrong, and
those who are
Whole do not
need him. And
as a physician,
Jesus did not
come for the
salvation of
those who are
Whole,
but only for
those who are
sick and in need
of a
physician. And
in total
opposition to
Church dogma,
what this also
means is that at
the time the
historical man
Jesus walked the
face of the
earth, there
existed people
who he portrayed
as
"whole [and]
righteous"
who did not need
Jesus the
physician.
Jesus openly
states that his
mission as a
spiritual
physician is not
for them,
because they
achieved the
necessary
Wholeness
without him.
Does everyone
need Jesus as
the modern
Christian
maintains?
While Jesus
himself said
that those who
had achieved
Wholeness did
not need him as
a spiritual
physician --
i.e.,
They that are
whole have no
need of the
physician..."
--
and that with
effort, all of
mankind is
capable of
achieving a
condition that
Jesus portrayed
as
"whole [and]
righteous",
which means that
these people who
did achieve
Wholeness, were
not sick, and in
Jesus' own words
were not in need
of him (Jesus)
as a physician
to heal them.
Which means that
the whole
foundation of
modern Church
dogma is
man-made and in
error.
It is impossible
to achieve the
necessary
condition of
Wholeness, so
long as the
person's mind is
only functioning
through the
limitations
imposed upon
their thinking
through the
Linear
(outward/male)
spheres of mind.
Which means that
the necessary
Wholeness can
only be
achieved, when a
catalyst is used
as an
Intervention
into the
person's
organic consciousness.
The Linear
spheres of mind
are limited in
their
perceptive-vision
and
understanding,
because the
Linear can only
draw knowledge
through one of
the four gates
of the mind that
look outwardly.
And so long as
the (male)
Linear spheres
of mind remain
dominate in the
process of
learning --
learning
primarily
through external
teachers and
physical
experiences -- the
mind of the
person will
remain
outward-looking
and flat-lined
-- unable to
mature beyond a
certain point of
quasi-development.
The scriptures
are designed to
bring about
Wholeness of
mind -- but if
the
linear/historical
interpretations
of the
scriptures are
permitted to
control the
thinking of the
person, then it
will remain
impossible to
bring about the
necessary
mental-expansion
and
spiritual-deepening
that is the
foundation of
not only a
higher level of
enlightenment,
but also
Self-Knowledge.
So long as the
three-dimensional
linear/historical
perception of
man's reality is
allowed to
control the
Intuitive and
other spheres of
mind, the
development of
these other
spheres of mind
will remain
negated and
atrophied --
thereby
inhibiting any
degree of
achieving
Wholeness.
When Jesus said:
"If you
continue in My
word, you are
truly My
disciples. Then
you will know
the truth, and
the truth will
set you free”
(John 8:31-32)
-- this
knowledge and
truth that makes
the person free,
can only come to
a mind that is
Whole.
Therefore, what
is presented in
the written
words of the
scriptures must
be understood as
being beyond the
Linear spheres
of the reader's
mind to decipher
and understand
the meaning of.
In many respects
the Linear which
interprets the
scriptures
exclusively in a
linear/historical
manner, must
somehow be
handcuffed and
inhibited from
dominating over
the other
spheres of mind,
and in their
interpretations
which the linear
mind would
portray as
rational and
logical, ruling
over the
interpretation
of the
scriptures.
Why? To
evolve the mind
of the person
beyond organic
limitations,
paradoxical
opposites that
exist within the
mind must be
united and
raised up -- and
to accomplish
this,
allegorical
catalysts must
be employed
within the
textual body of
the scriptures
in what can
perhaps best be
portrayed as
reverse-stimulation
-- i.e., drawing
out from a
pre-existing
Source within
the depths of
higher
consciousness --
thereby
stimulating and
developing the
inward looking
Intuitive
spheres of mind
that is often
seen as
irrational to
the
outward-looking
linear spheres
of mind.
Safeguards must
be put in place
to suspend
linear
domination --
with the problem
being that if
the Linear
(male/outward)
is allowed to
exercise its
natural power to
rule over the
Intuitive
(feminine/inward),
no higher
development of
mind can be
brought about.
And without this
process of
reverse-stimulation
and the
elevation of
paradoxical
opposites that
exist within the
mind in what can
be portrayed as
four (4)
trinities, the
consciousness of
the
person/student
will remain
flat-lined (see
Tree Of Life @
http://TreeOfLife.Nazirene.org
).
In order to
begin to develop
the
inward-looking
Intuitive
(feminine)
spheres of mind,
a catalyst must
be used that
will inhibit
outward-looking
Linear (male)
domination of
the person's
thinking and
conclusions.
In the Gospels
associated with
Mary Magdalene
it is written:
“She speaks
to the other
disciples about
Jesus and what
she’s seen, and
Peter says, ‘I
don’t believe
the Lord said
these things.
These are
certainly
strange ideas.’
And she says,
‘Well, do you
think I made
them up? Do you
think I’m lying
about the
Lord?’” (see
The Intuitive
Mind vs
Linear-Rational
http://SoulSelf.org#IntuitiveVsLinear
). In this
allegorical
representation,
the
linear-rational
aspect of mind
is represented
in Peter's
inability to
comprehend what
the
feminine-intuitive
(as represented
in the
allegorical
personification
of Mary
Magdalene)
reveals. And
since these
intuitive
visions,
impressions and
wisdom does not
support the
linear reasoning
of the masculine
vision of this
world and
Creation, in
most people they
are rejected.
But in view of
the fact that
the Linear
(male)
outward-looking
perception is
portrayed as the
"broad-way"
of death, a
catalyst must be
used to
intervene in the
thinking of the
seeker/disciple
that enables
them to begin to
tap into the
Intuitive
(feminine)
inward-looking
spheres of mind
as allegorically
portrayed in the
personage of
Mary Magdalene.
Wholeness can
only be achieved
across the
spectrum of the
four gates where
both the Linear
and Intuitive
are equal and
brought together
in the Center --
thereby
restoring the
division of the
upper-heavenly
and
lower-earthly
within the mind
of the
seeker/disciple.
Do we understand
the higher
purpose and
objective of the
scriptures?
It is the
product of our
own ego-driven
thinking that is
the basis of our
questioning the
intelligence of
the authors of
the scriptures
because of the
countless
discordances,
inconsistencies
and errors that
exist in the
body of the
text.
It never dawns
on us that the
authors
intentionally
inserted what
appears to be
the countless
discordances
into the body of
the text for an
important
purpose.
And it is in
fact these
discordances,
inconsistencies
and seemingly
errors that are
important in
suppressing the
domination of
the Linear
(male)
interpretation
of the
scriptures.
Those who
understood the
purpose and
objective of the
scriptures, and
utilized them as
the Key of
Knowledge (see
The Application
Of The Key Of
Knowledge
http://KeyOfKnowledge.org#ApplicationOfTheKeyOfKnowledge
) to
develop the
inward Intuitive
spheres of mind,
recognized that
the
inconsistencies
which were
intentionally
inserted into
the text, were
employed as
catalysts that
could only be
interpreted in
accord with the
ability of the
person to draw
from within to
the Inner Source
of Knowledge.
And if we pose
the question:
Why are the
scriptures
composed in
their present
allegorical
manner?
Because to be
effective, they
must stimulate
the thinking of
the people not
only in a linear
manner, but also
by employing
catalysts that
bring about the
process of
reverse-stimulation.
In the words of
Einstein:
"Imagination
is more
important than
knowledge"
-- because
imagination is
intuitive, and
can be used as a
vehicle to
reverse-stimulate
the developing
mind.
Einstein also
warned that
"The intuitive
mind is a sacred
gift and the
rational mind is
a faithful
servant. We have
created a
society that
honors the
servant and has
forgotten the
gift."
Why is the
Intuitive mind a
sacred gift?
Because it has
the power and
ability to
access
inner-consciousness
and manifest the
Higher Mind of
not only our
True-Self, but
ultimately the
Mind of God
(Logos).
Paul correctly
portrayed the
written text and
narrative of the
scriptures as
the
"letter that
killeth [and]
Jewish
folktales"
(see 2 Cor 3:6;
Titus 1:14).
Why? Why would
Paul portray the
written
narrative of the
scriptures in
this manner?
Because the
literal text of
the scriptures
is a
quasi-historical
facade that is
necessary for
the very limited
instruction of
the immature
seeker -- with
the true
spiritual
meaning
remaining
preserved and
concealed
beneath the garb
of allegory (see
An Inconvenient
Truth).
When Paul stated
that he was
forced to
provide the
baptized and
committed
Christians who
he had himself
taught, what he
portrayed as
"milk",
because as
"babes in
Christ"
they were too
immature to
comprehend the
higher reality
of the Soul and
the Mysteries of
the Kingdom,
what he was
warning the
faith-based
Christian was
that man's
higher spiritual
reality was
beyond the
rational of
their
linear-outward
looking minds.
And that the
literal body of
the scriptures
which was built
upon
"Jewish
folktales"
(see Titus
1:14), possessed
an important
meaning that
could only be
comprehended by
those who are
themselves Whole
and Complete.
And this is why
the Church
Father Origen
explained that
“Scripture
contains an
unhistorical
element in-woven
with the
history, in
order that the
worthlessness of
the latter may
drive us to seek
the spiritual
meaning”
(Origen quoted
under Origen
Adamntius; The
Encyclopedia of
Religion and
Ethics).
Further
explaining in De
Principiis that:
“Where the
word found that
things done
according to the
history could be
adapted to these
mystical senses,
he made use of
them concealing
from the
multitude the
deeper meaning;
but where in the
narrative of the
development of
super-sensual
things, there
did not follow
the performance
of those certain
events which
were already
indicated by the
mystical
meaning, the
scripture
interwove in the
history the
account of some
event that did
not take place,
sometimes what
could not have
happened;
sometimes what
could but did
not.”
Which provokes
the question:
Why is the
literal/historical
interpretation
of the
scriptures
portrayed as
"worthless"?
Why would the
Living Word
(Logos)
intentionally
insert into the
body of the text
"...some
events that did
not take place,
sometimes what
could not have
happened;
sometimes what
could but did
not”?
Further,
not only was the
unhistorical
events that were
in-woven into
the textual body of the
scriptures
easily detected,
but they were
intentionally
designed to be
recognized as
not literally or
historically
true. In
the words of the
Church Father Origen who was
called the
"prince of
Christian
learning",
second only to
the disciples,
writes:
“What man of
sense will agree
with the
statement that
the first,
second and third
days in which
the evening is
named and the
morning, were
without sun,
moon and stars,
and the first
day without a
heaven. What man
is found such an
idiot as to
suppose that God
planted trees in
paradise in
Eden, like a
husbandman, and
planted therein
the tree of
life,
perceptible to
the eyes and
senses, which
gave life to the
eater thereof;
and another tree
which gave to
the eater
thereof a
knowledge of
good and evil? I
believe that
every man must
hold these
things for
images, under
which the hidden
sense lies
concealed”
(Origen - Huet.,
Prigeniana, 167
Franck, p. 142).
Why were the
scriptures
written in this
manner? In
order to develop
the mind beyond
human organic
limitations, the
process of
reverse-stimulation
or the drawing
from the inner
consciousness of
the person, had
to be present in
order to develop
the
inward-looking
Intuitive
spheres of mind
-- balance out
the four (4)
paradoxical
trinities that
are responsible
for the great
diversity of
human potential
of thought --
and thereby
bring about
Wholeness of
Mind and
Consciousness.
And in order to
recognize the
existence of the
in-woven
historical/literal
untruths that
are embedded
into the textual
body of the
scriptures, the
authors made use
of the common
beliefs of the
people in a
re-engineered
form.
Therefore, in
order for the
scriptures to be
effective in the
development of
the mind, it was
necessary to use
familiar beliefs
that the people
already held --
beliefs which
were often based
upon myth and
folklore -- but
in their
re-engineered
form, provided a
means to begin
to tap into an
Inner Source of
pre-existing
knowledge that
surpassed the
knowledge of
mankind.
In the words of
the Church
Father Origen we
find his
assertion that
the scriptures
take on a form
which is
appropriate to a
certain group of
people, so that
it might begin
the process of
bringing those
people to a
mental and
spiritual level
of maturity (see
The Great Lie
About The
Scriptures
http://BrotherOfJesus.org#TheGreatLie
). And this is
explained by Origen who
writes that:
“If a Greek
wished by
wholesome
instruction to
benefit people
who understood
only Egyptian or
Syriac, the
first thing that
he would do
would be to
learn their
language; and he
would rather
pass for a
Barbarian among
the Greeks, by
speaking as the
Egyptians or
Syrians, in
order to be
useful to them,
than always
remain Greek,
and be without
the means of
helping them. In
the same way the
divine nature,
having the
purpose of
instructing not
only those who
are reputed to
be learned in
the literature
of Greece, but
also the rest of
mankind,
accommodated
itself to the
capacities of
the simple
multitudes whom
it addressed. It
seeks to win the
attention of the
more ignorant by
the use of
language which
is familiar to
them, so that
they may easily
be induced,
after their
first
introduction, to
strive after an
acquaintance
with the deeper
truths which lie
hidden in
Scripture. For
even the
ordinary reader
of Scripture may
see that it
contains many
things which are
too deep to be
apprehended at
first; but these
are understood
by such as
devote
themselves to a
careful study of
the divine word,
and they become
plain to them in
proportion to
the pains and
zeal which they
expend upon its
investigation”
(Origen Contra
Celsum).
The Octave And
The Rainbow:
In the same way
that the notes
of an octave and
the colors of
the rainbow are
created by
mathematical
frequencies,
this is also
true of the
levels of human
consciousness.
The White Light
associated with
man's higher
Soul-Reality in
the Being of
Light (see
http://BeingOfLight.com
), is
comprised of the
seven primary
colors of the
rainbow -- and
these seven
colors are
emitted by the
seven spiritual
centers of the
body -- each of
the colors and
spectrum of
associated sound
is the
embodiment of
the mathematical
frequencies that
support the
consciousness
associated with
that spiritual
center (see The
Application Of
The Law Of
Octaves And The
Trinity
http://TreeOfLife.Nazirene.org#LawOfOctaves
).
And the
importance of
this is stated
in the words:
"I do set my
bow in the
cloud, and it
shall be for a
token of a
covenant between
me and the
earth"
(Gen 9:13) --
meaning, that to
understand the
relationship of
the seven colors
and their
mathematical
frequencies of
the rainbow, is
to begin to
understand the
foundations of
consciousness.
Pythagoras,
Giordano Bruno,
Gurdjieff are
among those who
stated facts
with respect to
the framework of
consciousness
that modern
physicists have
only now proven to be
true -- i.e., that the
Laws and the
Foundation of
Creation were
all composed in
Mathematics and
Numbers.
From the
perspective of
the Mystic who
develops those
areas of mind
that enable
him/her to look
beyond the
physical images
of this realm,
modern science
has proven the
wisdom and
witness of the
Mystic, and this is
demonstrated and
explored at The
True Facts And
Realities Of
Life
http://KnowThySelf.Nazirene.org#TrueFactAndRealitiesOfLife
. And
while the
analogy of
Plato's Cave has
been confirmed
by modern
science (see
Plato - The
Physicist
http://KnowThySelf.Nazirene.org#Plato
), the dilemma
that confronts
the modern
physicists is
the fact that
they simply do
not possess the
necessary
knowledge of the
Cosmology of
Mind to escape
the Cave of
Illusions of
this world.
Why?
Because they
lack the
necessary
understanding of
how the mind is
expanded and
deepened --
which wisdom
lies concealed
within
the allegorical
scriptures and
their true
purpose and
objective.
In the Epistle
of Peter to
James the
warning is
presented that
if the esoteric
body of
knowledge that
Jesus revealed
to his disciples
should become
lost, that
"...it will
remain even for
those who really
seek the truth,
always to wander
in error".
Why?
Because embedded
within the
allegorical body
of the
scriptures is
the framework of
esoteric self-knowledge that
enables the
seeker/disciple
to develop the
mind beyond
organic human
limitations,
thereby enabling
them to achieve
the necessary
Wholeness to
escape the
limitations of
this
shadow-world
(see Wholeness
of Mind & Being
http://TreeOfLife.Nazirene.org#wholeness
). And to
bring this
Enlightened
Condition of
Mind and Being
about, is why
Jesus stated:
"They that
are whole have
no need of the
physician, but
they that are
sick: I came not
to call the
righteous, but
sinners to
repentance"
(Mark 2:17).
Which means that
at the time that
the man Jesus
walked the earth
there were those
present who had
achieved the
necessary
Wholeness that
enabled them to
perceptively-understand
the higher
Soul-Reality
that organic man
remains
inherently blind
to -- even to
the degree that
they were able
to enter the
Spiritual
Source-Realm
that we portray
as the Kingdom.
And as a
physician, Jesus
was not called
to heal those
who had achieved
the necessary
Wholeness -- but
rather, those
whose organic
consciousness
remained carnal
and caused them
to be prisoners
of this world.
In the
subheading
entitled
The Original
Spiritual
Language Of The
Gospels (see
http://OriginalGospel.Ebionite.com#OriginalLanguage
), I demonstrate
that the
Original Gospels
were written in
Biblical Hebrew
Characters --
and in this
language without
vowels, each
letter is also a
number. The
authors of the
Gospels composed
their scriptures in Living
Biblical Hebrew,
because they
understood that
every level of
Consciousness is
associated with
vibratory
frequencies --
as is individual
colors that
together
manifest the
white light of
the Soul, and notes
within the
pattern of an
octave. Each
of the authors
understood the
Law of Octaves
(see The
Application Of
The Law Of
Octaves And The
Trinity
http://TreeOfLife.Nazirene.org#LawOfOctaves
), and its
effect upon the
movement of the
Natural Laws of
Creation and
Consciousness
within the mind
of the
seeker/disciple.
What this means
is that every
name that is
used in the
biblical text
composed in the
Hebrew
Characters, not
only has a
meaning in what
the names and
places portray
in their meaning -- as well as
how the name is
used - but also
has a numerical
equivalent that
when used and
understood in
conjunction with
the other names
of people,
places or
things, can
portray an
esoteric meaning
that is not at
all apparent to
the readers who
believe they are
reading either a
myth, folklore,
or an historical
account.
And while the
linear spheres
of mind cannot
make sense of
what is being
presented
through the
symbols and
catalysts
embedded in the
textual body of
the scriptures,
once developed,
the intuitive
spheres of mind
are able to tap
into the inner
Source of
knowledge that
reveals to the
seeker/disciple
what is being
allegorically
presented. When
the scriptures
are read from an
historical
perspective, the
reader relates
the names a
historical
people or places
-- failing to
understand that
each name
portrays a
meaning that
presents an
aspect of mind
and
consciousness
that is
signified in the
names and places
in the
allegorical
text.
Why is this
important?
Because the
linear spheres
of mind are only
capable of
perceptively
understanding
the surface of
what is
outwardly seen.
Thereby failing
to understand
that what is
outwardly seen
is an incomplete
allegorical
image of an
Unseen Higher
Reality that
modern science
has now proven
the existence of
(see The True
Facts And
Realities Of
Life
http://KnowThySelf.Nazirene.org#TrueFactAndRealitiesOfLife
). And this is why
it is stated:
“Unto you it
is given to know
the mystery of
the kingdom of
God: but unto
them that are
without, all
these things are
done in
parables: That
seeing they may
see, and not
perceive; and
hearing they may
hear, and not
understand”
(Mark
4:11-12 KJV).
So long as a
person's
thinking is
founded upon the
incomplete
outward
linear
perception of
reality, they
will remain
blind to their
own higher
Soul-Realty,
incapable of
hearing with any
depth of
comprehension,
and incapable of
understanding.
Thus, the
reality of the
words:
"To him who
overcomes will I
give to eat of
the hidden
manna"
(Rev 2:8-17).
Overcome what?
Overcome the
organic human
limitations of
mind.
And when the
scriptures are
used as the Key
of Knowledge and
turned within
the
seeker/disciples
own mind and
being -- thereby
enabling the
intuitive and
other spheres of
mind to develop
in order to
nurture
Wholeness --
only then can
the
seeker/disciple
begin to receive
the Divine Manna
of the Kingdom
(see The Divine
Manna - The
Gospels - The
foundation of
the New Covenant
http://BrotherOfJesus.org#NewCovenant
).
Which is why
Paul portrayed
the
linear/historical
interpretation
of the
scriptures as
the
"letter that
killeth"
(see 2 Cor 3:6).
Symbols Of
Esoteric
Knowledge:
What is
Esoteric
Knowledge?
Why does
Esoteric
Knowledge exist?
Jesus taught
that the Kingdom
is within you --
beyond the
vision of man's
physical outward
looking vision
and organic
understanding --
which means that
the knowledge of
the Inner
Kingdom is
Esoteric -- and
can only be
revealed to
those who seek
the Kingdom in
the inner depths
of their Mind
and
Consciousness.
From a New
Covenant
perspective, what the Essenes
portrayed as the
Teacher of
Righteousness
was an alias for
the Mind of God
that the Greeks
portrayed as the
Logos, and the
Ebionites
portrayed as the
Son of God which
they called the
True Prophet
that Jesus
commanded his
disciples and
followers to
seek out (see
The One Teacher
http://BrotherOfJesus.org#TheOneTeacher
) as their ONLY
teacher. The Essene Elders
who understood
all of what such
men as
Pythagoras,
Bruno and Gurdjieff
understood with
respect to the
Natural Laws,
concealed much
of their sacred
knowledge within
the allegory of
the Books of
Enoch. And with
the advent of
the man Jesus
who fulfilled
the Laws within
his own mind and
being (see
The Essene
Foundation Of
Judaism And
Christianity
@
http://OriginalGospel.Ebionite.com#EsseneFoundation
), this body of
esoteric
self-knowledge
was transferred
into the
Original Gospels
(see
http://OriginalGospel.Ebionite.com
). The Essenes
were portrayed
as a people who
perpetually
studied the
scriptures --
and they did
this because
they understood
the embedded
power of the
symbols and
catalysts that
possess the
power to
transform,
expand and
deepen the
organic
consciousness of
man beyond
organic human
limitations.
Why would they
perpetually
study the same
scriptures?
Because as their
comprehension
increased
through the
process of
mental-expansion
and
spiritual-deepening,
more and more
knowledge was
revealed to them
through the
working of the
catalysts
embedded in the
scriptures. The Encyclopedia
Britannica
quotes Philo of
Alexandria with
respect to the Essenes and
Therapute:
They read the
Holy Scriptures,
from which they
sought wisdom by
treating them as
allegorical,
believing that
the words of the
literal text
were symbols of
something
hidden”.
And the
spiritual
meaning of the
scriptures can
only be revealed through the
interaction of
the Linear/male
and
Intuitive/female
Spheres of Mind
(see The Trinity
- Divine Pattern
- Linear vs
Intuitive
Development Of
The Mind
http://TreeOfLife.Nazirene.org/#Trinity
).
In order to
create
scriptures that
was appropriate
for the common
people who had
never begun the
process of
mental
transformation,
the authors of
the scriptures
re-engineered
the common
beliefs of the
people -- many
of which beliefs
can rightly be
portrayed as
being founded
upon myth or
folklore.
But what is myth
and folklore?
In many
instances it is
comprised of
non-physical
supernatural
realities that
can only be
envisioned
Intuitively
through
Imagination in a
reality beyond
man's physical
understanding of
life.
And when these
supernatural
realities beyond
physical
limitations are
understood as
allegorical
accounts of
Higher Mind that
can be brought
about in the
Consciousness of
the Enlightened
person who has
achieved
Wholeness, then
what is
figuratively
portrayed as
myth and
folklore becomes
a higher reality
that must be
achieved.
Jesus said:
"Truly,
truly, I tell
you, whoever
believes in Me
will also do the
works that I am
doing. He will
do even greater
things than
these"
(John
14:12). Why
can't Christians
fulfill this
Gospel promise?
Because they
fail to apply
the gospels as
the Key of
Knowledge, and
they fail to
perform the
necessary works
and miracles
within their own
mind and being
as they become
resurrected into
the Inner
Kingdom. Having
failed to
fulfill the
Gospel, they
neither are
sincere
believers or
worthy of the
Lord as stated
in the words:
“And he who
does not take
his cross and
follow after Me
is not worthy of
Me. He who finds
his life will
lose it, and he
who loses his
life for My sake
will find it”
(Matt
10:38-39).
Having failed to
fulfill the
works and
miracles within
them, they are
complacent and
therefore not
sincere
believers.
The final
product of
re-engineered
myths and
folklore
contained a
series of
symbols and
catalysts that
connected their
normal organic
human
consciousness
with a higher
level of
consciousness
that exists
within all of
mankind, and
ultimately an
Inner Source of
Knowledge and
Truth that
exceeds all the
cumulative
knowledge of
mankind
throughout all
the ages that
mankind has
walked the face
of the earth.
Thus, we have
the paradoxical
foundational
paradigms: Is
the mind of an
infant empty and
in need of being
taught the
wisdom of man?
Or does the
infant possess
an inner Source
of Knowledge
that is Superior
to the wisdom of
this world? The
infant
empty-mind
foundational
paradigm is
representative
of the
Old Covenant --
and the infant
full
foundational
paradigm is the
New Covenant.
Thus, in the
re-engineered
versions of
scripture, what
we are presented
with is the
basis of the
infant-full
mindset.
When you teach
in the
traditional
manner, you
disseminate
information to
the Linear
spheres of mind
in order to
instruct them
through what has
been portrayed
as
rote-programming.
This is defined
as
"The process of
learning or
committing
something to
memory through
mechanical
repetition,
usually by
hearing and
repeating aloud,
often without
full attention
to comprehension
or thought for
the meaning."
The problem with
this type of
traditional
learning and
instruction is
seen in the fact
that, you can't
expand normal
human
consciousness
beyond organic
human
limitations
through
traditional
Linear (rote)
programming.
Why? What
we fail to
understand is
the fact that
the framework of
the scriptures
is built upon an
infant full-mind
foundation --
which equates
all wisdom and
knowledge of
this world as
being at best
incomplete, with
most of it
portrayed as
fool's-gold --
and like fool's
gold, the wisdom
and knowledge of
this world
presents a
superficial
resemblance to
actual
knowledge.
Therefore, the
reality of the
scriptures is in
the fact that
they were
designed to
overcome the
limitations of
linear (rote)
learning and
instruction by
providing the
person a path to
acquire to
genuine
knowledge and
truth. To the
degree that what
is portrayed as
scriptural
writings were
intentionally
designed to
inhibit
traditional
Linear (rote)
learning -- and
blocks were
inserted into
the literal text
that forced the
reader/student
to look beyond
the linear
interpretation
of the written
text. And while
it is true that
the common
person does not
readily
understand this
reality of the
scriptures, that
does not mean
that their
ignorance will
negate the
process of inner
development.
Which means that
if you are
intelligent
enough to
question the
validity of the
literal text,
the question
then becomes
whether you
possess the
intuitive
insight to seek
the deeper
meaning? And
when the purpose
and objectives
of the
scriptures are
truly
understood, it
is this
development of
the Intuitive
spheres of mind
that is the
primary
objective of the
sacred
writings.
In the same way
that elementary
students cannot
comprehend
advanced
mathematics, in
order to create
scriptures that
were appropriate
for the common
people who had
never begun the
process of
mental
development and
transformation
beyond organic
human
comprehension,
the authors of
the scriptures
re-engineered
the common
beliefs of the
people -- many
of which beliefs
can rightly be
portrayed as
being founded
upon myth or
folklore.
Why? If you
attempted to
teach a group of
people truths
that were new,
contrary to, or
in conflict with
their beliefs
they already
hold, they would
either
(1)
immediately
reject what was
being presented
to them; and/or
(2)
Linear rote
programming of
new material
would fail to
develop the
Intuitive
spheres of mind
and bring about
the connection
to the Inner
Source of Higher
Knowledge that
ALREADY exists
within each of
us. Therefore,
it is imperative
to begin the
development
process by
presenting a
foundational
environment that
the people can
embrace and
begin the
process of
mental-expansion
and
spiritual-deepening.
Development
beyond the
natural limits
of organic human
consciousness,
requires a
balance and
union of
opposites within
the mind of the
person -- i.e.,
Linear and
Intuitive,
earthly and
heavenly, inner
and outer -- as
expressed in the
statement in the
Gospel of Thomas
as to when the
Kingdom would
come within the
mind of the
INDIVIDUAL
seeker:
"Jesus
said to them,
When you make
the two one, and
when you make
the inside like
the outside and
the outside like
the inside, and
the above like
the below, and
when you make
the male and the
female one and
the same, so
that the male
not be male nor
the female
female;
...then will you
enter the
kingdom."
Therefore, in
order to bring
about the
mental-expansion
and
spiritual-deepening
of the mind of
the person
beyond organic
human
limitations, it
is imperative to
work within the
framework of
that person's
existing
beliefs. And
from an infant
mind-full
perspective, it
is this working
within the
person's
existing
framework of
mind that
creates the
final product of
re-engineered
myths and
folklore
containing a
series of
symbols and
catalysts that
connects their
normal organic
consciousness
with both a
higher level of
consciousness
that exists
within all of
mankind, and
ultimately
connects the
person to an
Inner Source of
Knowledge and
Truth that
exceeds all the
cumulative
knowledge of
mankind
throughout all
the ages that
mankind has
walked the face
of the earth
(see The One
Teacher
http://BrotherOfJesus.org#TheOneTeacher
).
Unless the
interaction of
opposites --
i.e.,
male/linear with
female/intuitive,
upper heavenly
with lower
earthly and
inner and outer
is brought about
-- it will
remain
impossible to
evolve the mind
of the person
beyond what can
be portrayed as
organic human
consciousness
(see Animal-Soul
http://AnInconvenientTruth.org#animal
). Teaching the
person new
information, is
little more than
traditional
linear rote
programming that
further
alienates them
from their Inner
Source of Mind
and Being. In
order to evolve
the mind of the
person beyond
the limits of
organic human
consciousness,
you must work
within the
framework of
their existing
beliefs and
foundational
mindset --
re-engineering
their existing
beliefs with
symbols and
catalysts that
Intuitively
connect the
Inner and the
Outer.
While
the people
accepted and
embraced the
writings because
on the surface
they appeared to
confirm and
support their
beliefs which
their culture
has previously
embraced, the
changes made in
the
re-engineering
process opened
the door to a
depth of mind
and spirit that
is not at all
understood by
those who see
only the surface
of the text.
And this reality
is expressed by
the Jewish
mystic in
the Zohar where
it states:
“The narratives
of the doctrine
are its
cloak. The
simple look only
on the garment,
that is upon the
narrative of the
doctrine; more
they know
not. The
instructed,
however, see not
merely the
cloak, but what
the cloak
covers”.
The Jewish
mystic who
spends his life
seeking the
inner meaning of
the written word
that the natural
mind of man is
incapable of
seeing, has
warned:
"Thus the tales
related in the
Torah are simply
her outer
garments, and
woe to the man
who regards that
outer garb as
the Torah
itself, for such
a man will be
deprived of
portion in the
next world..."
(the
Zohar quoted in
No Jew Has Read
The Torah).
The One Teacher:
Jesus commanded
his disciples
and followers to
have One
Teacher:
"But you are
not to be called
rabbi, for you
have One
Teacher, and you
are all
brethren"
(Matt 23:8
RSV).
The Essenes
portrayed this
One Teacher as
the Teacher of
Righteousness.
The Ebionite
Nazirenes
portrayed him as
the True
Prophet.
The Greeks
portrayed him as
the Logos -- or
Word of God.
Each of these
portray the Mind
of God that is
at the very Core
and Essence of
our
Consciousness --
which has also
been portrayed
as the Son of
God. The
Gentile
Christians were
too carnal to
understand the
Gospels, and
they replaced
the historical
man Jesus with
the actual
incarnation of
the Son of God.
In the same way
that the carnal
Gentile converts
could not
understand the
man Jesus
entering into a
Coverture-Union
with the
indwelling Son
of God (see
Coverture-Marriage
- Was Jesus God?
http://BrotherOfJesus.org#CovertureMarriage ),
in the
corruption of
Islam, the man
Mohammed
replaced the
Indwelling True
Prophet that all
of mankind must
seek out as the
One Teacher (see
The Universal
Path Of TheWay
http://BrotherOfJesus.org#TheUniversalPathOfTheWay ).
With
respect to this
ONE TEACHER that
is Universal to
all religions
that the
followers of
Jesus were
commanded to
seek out
exclusively, in
the Homilies of
his disciple
Clement the
Apostle Peter
taught that the
One Teacher who
they portrayed
as the True
Prophet, is
within the mind
of all mankind.
Thus, Peter is
quoted as
stating:
"...And
therefore I
advise not only
wise men, but
indeed all men
who have a
desire of
knowing what is
advantageous to
them, that they
seek after the
True Prophet;
for it is He
alone who
knoweth all
things, and who
knoweth what and
how every man is
seeking.
For he is within
the mind of
every one of us,
but in those who
have no desire
of the knowledge
of God and His
righteousness,
He is
inoperative; but
He works in
those who seek
after that which
is profitable to
their souls, and
kindles in them
the light of
knowledge. Wherefore
seek Him first
of all; and if
you do not find
Him, expect not
that you shall
learn anything
from any other. But
He is soon found
by those who
diligently seek
Him through love
of the truth,
and whose souls
are not taken
possession of by
wickedness. For
He is present
with those who
desire Him in
the innocence of
their spirits,
who bear
patiently, and
draw sighs from
the bottom of
their hearts
through love of
the truth; but
He deserts
malevolent
minds, because
as a prophet He
knows the
thoughts of
every one. And
therefore let no
one think that
he can find Him
by his own
wisdom, unless,
as we have said,
he empty his
mind of all
wickedness, and
conceive a pure
and faithful
desire to know
Him. For when
any one has so
prepared
himself, He
Himself as a
prophet, seeing
a mind prepared
for Him, of His
own accord
offers Himself
to his
knowledge”
What Peter is
stating is that
while the True
Prophet exists
at the core of
the mind of all of mankind,
(1)
"...in those
who have no
desire of the
knowledge of God
and His
righteousness,
He is
inoperative";
(2)
"...But He is
soon found by
those who
diligently seek
Him through love
of the truth";
(3) that the
True Prophet
"...deserts
malevolent
minds, because
as a prophet He
knows the
thoughts of
every one";
(4) that we
cannot find the
True Prophet on
our own as
stated that
"...let no one
think that he
can find Him by
his own wisdom,
unless, as we
have said, he
empty his mind
of all
wickedness";
(5) and that to
draw nearer and
find the
Indwelling True
Prophet, the
seeker must
"...empty his
mind of all
wickedness, and
conceive a pure
and faithful
desire to know
Him. For when
any one has so
prepared
himself, He
Himself as a
prophet, seeing
a mind prepared
for Him, of His
own accord
offers Himself
to his
knowledge”.
When rightly
understood, to
find and learn
from the
Indwelling True
Prophet, the
seeker must
become the
"good ground"
in the parable
of the Sower and
the Seed (see
http://Messianic.Nazirene.org/sower_seed.html
). And in the
parable of the
Sower and the
Seed, the same
seed that is
cast into the
ground that is
properly
prepared and
produces in
levels of
abundance ("For
when any one has
so prepared
himself, He
Himself as a
prophet, seeing
a mind prepared
for Him, of His
own accord
offers Himself
to his
knowledge”
), is unable to
germinate and
produce when the
ground in which
it has been cast
is not properly
prepared ("...but
He deserts
malevolent minds
...in those who
have no desire
of the knowledge
of God and His
righteousness,
He is
inoperative").
One may ask:
Isn't the
scriptures
composed in
order to teach
the person what
they need to
know? No!
The scriptures
are designed to
develop the mind
and bring about
the necessary
condition of
Wholeness that
enables the
person to begin
to be taught by
the indwelling
Logos/Son of God
that the
historical man
Jesus entered
into a Coverture-Union
with (see
Coverture-Marriage
- Was Jesus God?
http://BrotherOfJesus.org#CovertureMarriage
).
In further
explanation of
this Inner
Source of Truth
and Knowledge
which the
original
followers of
Jesus portrayed
as the True
Prophet, Peter
cautions the
seeker and
states with
respect to
reading and
studying the
scriptures that
"...therefore
great care is to
be taken, that
when the law of
God is read, it
be not read
according to the
understanding of
our own mind.
For there are
many sayings in
the divine
Scriptures which
can be drawn to
that sense which
every one has
preconceived for
himself; and
this ought not
to be done. For
you ought not to
seek a foreign
and extraneous
sense, which you
have brought
from without".
What this
means is that
there can be no
valid
interpretation
from a human
perspective.
It means that
all the
historical
interpretations
set forth in the
pulpits across
Christendom, are
all preaching
grave error.
And these
preachers of the
Gospel are the
blind guides
that Jesus
portrayed as
the
"spawn of the
devil"
who leading the
people in the
wrong
direction (see
Christianity -
The Devil's
Spawn
http://DevilSpawn.Ebionite.com
).
Therefore, in
view of the fact
that the true
follower of
Jesus is barred
from seeking
"...a foreign
and extraneous
sense, which you
have brought
from without"
--
as set forth by
Peter in the
Homilies of
Clement it is
portrayed as a
sin to seek out
any other
teacher than the
True Prophet --
as seen in the
words:
"But the ways
in which this
garment may be
spotted are
these: If any
one withdraw
from God the
Father and
Creator of all,
receiving
another teacher
besides Christ,
who alone is the
faithful and
True Prophet"
(see
Baptism
- The Required
Wedding Garment
http://TheCall.Nazirene.org#TheWeddingGarment
) -- which
Wedding Garment
when Pure, enables each
seeker to enter
into the same
Coverture-Union
with the
Indwelling
Logos/Son of God
that Jesus did
(see
The
Foundation Of A
Coverture-Marriage
http://BrotherOfJesus.org#FoundationOfCovertureMarriage )
What this means
is that because
the modern
Church has
embraced the
dogma of pagan
Rome and rejects
the foundational
teaching to be
taught only from
the True Prophet
within them (see
The True Prophet
), they have
caused
themselves to be
"...withdrawn
from God the
Father and
Creator of all,
receiving
another teacher
besides Christ".
From an Original
Gospel
perspective,
there can be no
valid
interpretation
of the
scriptures drawn
from another
person, a rabbi
or teacher, an
authority of a
Church, or from
one of the
countless Bible
commentaries.
Why? Because
the scriptures
are not
historical
accounts -- and
every aspect of
the scriptures
are
"allegorical
...symbols of
something
hidden”.
Which is why
Jesus had to
open the mind of
the disciples to
reveal and
enable them to
see and
understand the real and
spiritual
meaning of the
allegorical
scriptures --
i.e.,
"Then opened He
their
understanding,
that they might
understand the
scriptures"
(Luke 24:45).
And those who
embrace the
literal text is
exactly as
portrayed by
Paul portrayed
them as the
"letter that
killeth [and]
Jewish
folktales"
(see 2 Cor 3:6;
Titus 1:14).
The Apostle
Peter states
that it is a sin
to seek out a
teacher other
than the
Indwelling True
Prophet.
Does it matter?
With respect to
a person
consciously
sinning Paul
warned:
"For it is
impossible to
restore again to
repentance those
who ...then
commit apostasy,
since they
crucify the Son
of God on their
own account and
hold him up to
contempt.. For
if we sin
deliberately
after receiving
the knowledge of
the truth, there
no longer
remains a
sacrifice for
sins, but a
fearful prospect
of judgment, and
a fury of fire
which will
consume the
adversaries."
(Heb
6:4-6;10:26-27
RSV). Those who
seek out a
teacher other
than the
Indwelling
Logos/Son of God
-- embracing an
historical
interpretation
of the
scriptures in
the manner of
the Jews,
instead of using
the Gospels as
the Key of
Knowledge to
unlock the mind
(see The
Application Of
The Key Of
Knowledge
http://KeyOfKnowledge.org#ApplicationOfTheKeyOfKnowledge
) -- rejects the
very foundation
of the New
Covenant (“I
will put my laws
in their minds
and write them
on their hearts.
I will be their
God, and they
will be my
people.
No longer will a
man teach his
neighbor,
or a man his
brother, saying,
'Know the Lord,'
because they
will all know
me, from the
least of them to
the greatest”
[Heb 8:10-11) --
and therefore
they are not
believers
because they
"...crucify
the Son of God
on their own
account and hold
him up to
contempt".
If we ask the
question: What
is being said to
the believer who
desires to be
faithful to the
Gospel
Teachings?
What we have in
the foregoing is
the confirmation
of the New
Covenant
Principles that
few modern
believers
understand the
spiritual
reality of. In
the same way
that the
believer is
commanded to
seek out the One
Teacher, and the
commandment that
"...when the law
of God
(scriptures) is
read, it be not
read according
to the
understanding of
our own mind"
-- it is being
stated that
there is only
One Source of
Truth -- and
that the wisdom
of man will
misguide the
seeker. By
design, human
reasoning is
embryonic, and
is incapable of
understanding
both the higher
reality of the
Soul and the true meaning
of the
scriptures --
i.e.,
"...therefore
great care is to
be taken, that
when the law of
God is read, it
be not read
according to the
understanding of
our own mind."
Why?
Because the
literal text is
allegorical and
designed to
bring about the
process of mental-expansion
and
spiritual-deepening
of the mind that
evolves the
person beyond
organic human
limitations.
And Peter also
warns that
neither should
you listen to
other men's
gravely flawed
interpretations
of the
scriptures --
i.e.,
"...For you
ought not to
seek a foreign
and extraneous
sense, which you
have brought
from without".
Why? Jesus
taught that
there is only
one Source of
Truth, and the
disciple/seeker
must learn
directly from
that One
Teacher. And
thus, these
words which are
representative
of the core
Gospel
teachings, are
inconceivable to
the modern
faith-based
believer who are
divided and
by virtue of
their carnal
mindset and
lifestyle, have
been disenfranchised
from the very
essence and
objectives of
the Gospel
teachings --
overwhelmed and
anchored to a
carnal mindset
that is of the
"outer
darkness"
(see
http://OuterDarkness.Nazirene.org
) -- spiritually
disenfranchised
by innumerable
manmade
opinions,
factions and
sects which
totally alienate
the believer
from the Truth
and the Kingdom
within.
The Apostle
Peter states
that while the
True Prophet is
within the minds
of all mankind,
there are
certain
conditions that
must be present
in order to
begin to learn
from the Inner
Source of Mind
and Being --
i.e.,
"but in those
who have no
desire of the
knowledge of God
and His
righteousness,
He is
inoperative".
And this fact of
human reality
was expressed by
the priest
Giordano Bruno
who was burnt as
the stake by the
Church when he
stated:
"The Divine
Light is always
in man,
presenting
itself to the
senses and to
the
comprehension,
but man rejects
it".
And while the
True Prophet and
the Source of
Light and Truth
exists within
the mind of
everyone of us,
Peter warns
that
"...He is soon
found by those
who diligently
seek Him through
love of the
truth".
Which
provokes the
questions: What
is the love of
the Truth? If
a supposed
believer clings
to the corrupted
words of the
Church (see The
Corruption Of
The Words Of God
http://BrotherOfJesus.org#CorruptionOfGodsWords
), does this
constitute a
genuine
"...love of the
truth"? No,
not at all --
which is why the
modern Christian
remains
spiritually
immature and
disenfranchised.
In making
reference to The
True Prophet who
Jesus portrayed
as the One
Teacher within
one's own mind
that must be
sought out,
Peter warns
that:
"Hence, O
beloved Clement,
if you would
know the things
pertaining to
God, you have to
learn them from
Him alone,
because He alone
knows the
truth." Which
provokes the
question: What
about the
scriptures?
Contrary to what
many believe,
the scriptures
are not
themselves the
Word of God --
but rather, the
scriptures are a
map of our own
mind -- i.e., a
blueprint of our
Consciousness -
that details how
to find the Word
of God -- in
accord with the
New Covenant,
within you. And
this is why
Peter warned in
the Homilies of
his disciple
Clement:
"...therefore
great care is to
be taken, that
when the law of
God is read, it
be not read
according to the
understanding of
our own mind.
For there are
many sayings in
the divine
Scriptures which
can be drawn to
that sense which
every one has
preconceived for
himself; and
this ought not
to be done. For
you ought not to
seek a foreign
and extraneous
sense, which you
have brought
from without".
(see
The Spiritual
Disenfranchisement
Of The Mind).
And in the same
way that
present-day
Christianity is
a religion of
innumerable
teachers and
almost countless
sects and
factions, the
reality of these
words are
totally
incomprehensible
to the modern
Church. Yet,
these words are
not only
representative
of the very core
foundation of
the Gospel
teachings, but
they are
representative
of the original
objectives of
the New
Covenant.
The Purpose Of
The Scriptures:
In the teaching
that the True
Prophet (a.k.a.
Logos and Son of
God) is at the
Core of our mind
and being (see
The One
Teacher
http://BrotherOfJesus.org#TheOneTeacher
), what
this means is
that we must
begin to develop
the necessary
depth of mind
that enables us
to begin to tap
into this Inner
Source of
Knowledge.
And this depth
can only be
brought about,
through
Wholeness.
Which means that
so long as our
thinking is only
through the
outward looking
linear spheres
of mind, it will
remain
impossible to
develop the
necessary
Wholeness to
Know Thyself,
and ultimately
Know God.
In their
original
condition the
Gospels
contained
important
spiritual
teachings and
concepts that
developed the
inward Intuitive
spheres of mind
-- enabling the
seeker to begin
to balance
the outward looking
Linear spheres -- in
preparation for
the
seeker/disciple
to employ the
process of
Anamnesis (The
Innate Knowledge
Of The Truth Of
All Truths:
http://AnInconvenientTruth.org#Innate
), to begin to
connect with the
True Prophet at
the Core and
Essence of their
Mind and Being
-- and it is
this inner
connection that
is the objective
of the New
Covenant
Gospels. By
developing the
latent Intuitive
areas of mind,
this prepares
the
seeker/believer
to receive the
Divine Manna of
the Kingdom (
The Foundation
of the New
Covenant
http://BrotherOfJesus.org#NewCovenant
). Therefore,
the Gospels were
not themselves
the Word of God
or the Sacred
Knowledge
portrayed as the
Divine Manna.
No one could
read the Gospels
and perceive the
Divine Manna.
Because the
Gospels were a
text-book on the
transformational
changes that the
seeker/disciple
had to bring
about in their
own lives to
begin to receive
the Divine Manna
that can only be
imparted to a
seeker in accord
with their
condition and
ability to
receive the
Spiritual
Nourishment
(Knowledge) that
can only be
received
directly from
God. But
because modern
man has
permitted
himself to
become alienated
from his
True-Self, and
Spiritually
Disenfranchised
by virtue of the
rote programming
of the Linear
spheres of mind,
the suppression
of the Intuitive
spheres of mind
(see
The Mental Cause
Of Gender
Violence
http://TreeOfLife.Nazirene.org#GenderViolence
), and the fact
that the
Churches have
embraced the
error of the
Jews in throwing
away the
Key of Knowledge
when reading and
interpreting the
scriptures, the
whole of our
thinking has
been rendered
mentally
flat-lined.
|
The Kingdom is Within You -- and yet, the vast majority of people are not even
aware of its existence at the core of their consciousness. Why? Because their
mind is focused outwardly, and few people ever develop those attributes of mind
that possess the ability to look inwardly. And thus the problem: No amount of
outward linear derived knowledge -- no amount of traditional linear education --
no amount of linear book-knowledge -- no amount of traditional teaching or
instruction -- can either develop the inward-looking Intuitive spheres of mind,
or provide access to the innate areas of mind that exist in the person's own
Higher Soul-Mind. In fact, it is this traditional outward-looking liner
instruction of modern academia that inhibits most people from evolving their
mind beyond organic human levels of comprehension. And it is the inward
development of the seekers own mind that enables the person to tap into the
inner Source of Knowledge, that is the sole purpose of the scriptures. How does
the scriptures accomplish this inner-looking development of Mind?
While
Jesus taught in enigmatic parables -- Plato portrayed the plight of man as being
a prisoner in a Cave of Illusions that are Allusions -- Emerson portrayed life
as a series of riddles that must be embraced and lived as seen in the statement:
"All is a riddle, and the key to a riddle is another
riddle". Thus, when rightly understood, the three perspectives
are the same with respect to the inability of the linear outward-looking mind to
understand the plight of man in this world.
Which
provokes the question:
How does a person develop the ability to perceive the
SOURCE in the Inner Kingdom? Quoting from the
Wikipedia
article on Plato's Cave: "Like the fire that cast light
on the walls of the cave, the human condition is forever bound to the
impressions that are received
through the senses.
Even if these interpretations ...are an absurd misrepresentation of reality, we
cannot somehow break free from the bonds of our human condition - we cannot free
ourselves from phenomenal state just as the prisoners could not free themselves
from their chains. If, however, we were to miraculously escape our bondage, we
would find a world that we could not understand... In other words, we would
encounter another 'realm,' a place incomprehensible because, theoretically, it
is the source of a higher reality than the one we have always known; it is the
realm of pure Form, pure fact." Which is
why man's higher spiritual reality is beyond even man's ability to comprehend.
What this means is that in the same way that there in no linear perception of
life that is sound, because it is the linear thinking that alienates us from
what Plato portrays as
"pure Form and pure fact".
Which means that to evolve the mind to comprehend, information must be
received intuitively, one level at a time. And this is why when the scriptures
are interpreted literally, historically or our minds are programmed by an
external source of instruction, that person inhibits and defeats the very
purpose of the scriptures to develop the inward-looking Intuitive aspects of
mind that is able to better interpret the allegorical symbolism of the
scriptures.
In order to
develop the Metaphysical inward-looking attributes of mind, the scriptures must
utilize what is often portrayed as myth or folklore which portrays a reality
beyond the three dimensional limitations of our physical world and undeveloped
consciousness. The scriptures therefore utilize allegorical symbols that act as
catalysts that connect the person we are in this world with our inner Self --
utilizing scriptures that utilize a quasi-historical facade that in most
instances are factually and historically inaccurate. Why? In order to develop
the Intuitive to slowly bring about the deepening and expansion of mind that enables the
seeker to learn directly from the Indwelling Logos/Son of God portrayed as the
True Prophet. Which means that when critics portray the scriptures as being
poorly written -- contradicting other Gospels -- that they contain countless
inconsistencies and discordances -- that they plagiarized other religions -- and
that they totally lack continuity with the Old Testament -- these critics fail
to understand the higher purpose and objective of the Sacred Writings. Why?
Because the countless inconsistencies, discordances and contradictions were
intentionally inserted into the written text so they cannot be read literally,
in order to develop the inward-looking Intuitive spheres of mind that are
suppressed by the outward-looking Linear spheres of mind. The embedded higher
spiritual meaning of the scriptures can only be understood by the Intuitive
spheres of mind that remain atrophied by the over-development of the Linear
outward-looking spheres of mind. And in their linear-minded critique, those who
only see the inconsistencies, discordances and contradictions of the scriptures
-- without understanding why the discordances were intentionally inserted into
the text of the written word -- are people who sentence themselves to lives of
being mentally inhibited and flat-lined. Wholeness of Mind requires the
development and balance of the Whole Mind of the person -- i.e.,
"They that are whole have no need of the physician, but
they that are sick: I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance"
(Mark 2:17). And with their lack of inward-looking perception, the people
who lack the development of balanced Wholeness are doomed to being spiritually
disenfranchised. When rightly understood with respect to the purpose and
objective of the scriptures, the inconsistencies and discordances, along with
the re-engineered myths and folklore -- were not only inserted into the written
text so that they would make absolutely no literal/historical sense to the
linear-minded reader -- but this obstacle to a linear interpretation is
necessary in order to force the linear to begin to communicate and learn from
the inward looking intuitive-insights and interpretations, in order to evolve
the mind to understand from a higher enlightened plane of comprehension. The
scriptures are not designed to teach the person what they need to know? The
scriptures are designed to develop the inward-looking innate aspects of mind and
bring about the necessary condition of Wholeness that enables the person to
begin to be taught by the indwelling True Prophet. And this is why in the
Homilies of his disciple Clement, the Apostle Peter cautions the seeker and
states with respect to reading and studying the scriptures that
"...therefore great care is to be taken, that when the law
of God is read, it be not read according to the understanding of our own mind.
For there are many sayings in the divine Scriptures which can be drawn to that
sense which every one has preconceived for himself; and this ought not to be
done. For you ought not to seek a foreign and extraneous sense, which you have
brought from without". Outward interpretations drawn from other
people from an external Linear perspective, defeats the very purpose of the
scriptures -- inhibiting the person's development. Any outward linear belief
that interprets the text in an outward historical manner, undermines the
allegorical catalysts designed to develop the inward intuitive spheres of mind,
and therefore defeats the very purpose of the scriptures. Jesus portrayed those
who interpret the scriptures outwardly and/or historically, as the
"spawn of the devil" (see Christianity -
The Devil's Spawn http://DevilSpawn.Ebionite.com
). Each person's ability to access their inner Self and the Knowledge of their
own Eternal Soul-Self, can only be achieved through the development of those
areas of mind that look Inward. If the Gospels were designed to instruct through
a linear outward perception, then they would be ineffective in the development
of the person's inner resources and attributes of mind. What the translators and
body of believers fail to understand, is the fact that the alleged discordances
and inconsistencies were intentionally inserted into the text of the scriptures
for a number of important reasons. Admittedly, what is truly difficult for the
untransformed carnal mindset of man to understand, is that each of the variant
readings are unique to understanding that passage of scripture from that
particular author from a spiritual perspective. Unique, because the scriptures
are not historical, and what is presented can only be understood when applied
within the person's own mind.
The
Crucifixion
Accounts:
Perhaps
the best
example
of this
non-historical
reality
is seen
in the
fact
that it
has been
long
noted
that
there is
no unity
and
common
witness
of the
Gospels
on the
crucifixion
accounts.
Further,
the
Gospel
accounts
of
Matthew,
Mark and
Luke
contradict
each
other's
records
of the
crucifixion
-- even
on the
parts
that
would be
seen as
the most
important.
Each of
the
Gospel
accounts
portray
Jesus as
having
died at
different
times of
the day
--
wherein
he
supposedly
spoke to
different
people
-- gave
different
sets of
final
words
and
confusingly
different
accounts
of the
circumstances
surrounding
the
death of
Jesus.
It is
not
simply a
case
that
they
recorded
different
details.
The
actions
of Jesus
in each
Gospel
account
reflect
general
differences
in
perception
about
what
Jesus'
character
should
be.
In
Mark's
account
Jesus is
silent
and
mocked
by all
around
him, and
cries
out in
despair
at the
end. But
in the
Gospels
of Luke
and
John,
Jesus is
talkative,
gives
advice,
and is
surrounded
by
followers
even
while on
the
cross.
Despite
the
massive
impact
they
would
have had
on
entire
communities,
the
Gospel
writers
also
record
different
supernatural
events
occurring
upon
Jesus'
death.
Matthew
27:51-53
describes
Earthquakes
and the
rising
of the
dead --
things
which no
one else
at all
noticed.
Quoting
from the
analysis
of these
accounts
from the
Wikipedia:
These
verses
see the
resurrection
of
"many"
saints,
and
their
appearance
in the
city
where
they are
seen by
"many."
The
concern
that
Biblical
scholars
have had
for
centuries
with
this
story,
is that
these
momentous
events
are
mentioned
nowhere
else.
Not only
are they
not
noticed
by any
contemporary
non-Christian
sources,
but none
of the
other
gospel
writers
mentions
this
occurring.
The
author
of
Matthew
gives no
further
details
himself
about
this
event.
No
reaction
to these
events
is
described,
nor does
he
mention
what
happened
to the
saints
after
their
appearance. Nolland
speculates
as to
what
happened
after to
the
risen
saints.
He
considers
it
unlikely
that
they
simply
returned
to the
grave
after a
brief
time
among
the
living,
he also
does not
think it
likely
that the
saints
resumed
their
normal
lives on
Earth.
Thus
Nolland
feels
that
Matthew
probably
imagines
the
saints
being
translated
directly
to
heaven
after a
short
time on
Earth,
similar
to
Elijah.
The text
also
makes no
note on
why
there is
a
two-day
delay
between
the
opening
of the
tombs
upon
Jesus'
death,
and the
saints'
appearance
in the
city
only
after
Jesus'
resurrection.
If these
events
only
happen
two days
hence,
why are
they
mentioned
here and
not with
the
miraculous
events
of the
resurrection
at
Matthew
28:2?
Some
later
manuscripts
have
"after
their
resurrection"
rather
than
"his,"
rearranging
the
timeline.
Schweizer
speculates
that
this
verse
contains
an
ancient
correction
to
Matthew's
original
manuscript.
Theologically
Jesus
had to
be the
first
person
resurrected,
so
Schweizer
believes
the
wording
of this
verse
was
switched
to
ensure
the
saints
only
rose
after
Jesus.
Most
modern
scholars
thus do
not
consider
these
events
to be
historical.
Bultmann
refers
to them
as "pure
novelistic
motifs."
Hagnar
states
that
these
events
make
more
theological
than
historical
sense.
Brown
comments
that the
strength
of this
part of
the
narrative
is
"atmosphere,
not
details."[6]
There
have
been
attempts
to
reconcile
this
verse
with
other
sources.
One
proposition
is that
by the
"holy
city"
Matthew
is not
referring
to
Jerusalem,
but
rather
to
heaven.
The
saints
thus
appeared
only in
heaven,
explaining
why no
other
source
makes
note of
this
event.
Most
scholars
reject
this
understanding,
as "holy
city"
has
referred
to
Jerusalem
throughout
Matthew's
gospel
(such as
at
Matthew
4:5).
The
theory
also
fails to
explain
what is
meant
when
Matthew
states
they
were
"seen by
many."
Each
gospel
writer
states
their
version
as fact,
even
though
it is
clear
that no
agreement
exists
among
the
Gospel
accounts.
Where
the
critics
will
reject
the
crucifixion
account
on what
they
perceive
to be
flawed
and
conflicting
accounts,
it
remains
beyond
their
comprehension
that the
Gospels
are not
at all
meant to
be
historical
accounts
-- and
each of
the
Gospel
narratives
must be
understood
as a
unique
spiritual
account
--
sometimes
portraying
the
experiences
of
different
spheres
and
aspects
of mind
(see
http://TreeOfLife.Nazirene.org
). From
the
perspective
of the
twelve
spheres
of mind
as
allegorically
represented
in the
twelve
disciples,
each of
the
spheres
of mind
experienced
what is
portrayed
as the
crucifixion
or
allegorical
portrayal
of the
Final
Stage of
Birth
differently.
And if
we were
able to
read
many of
the
Gospel
accounts
suppressed
by the
Church,
we would
find no
historical
agreement
among
those
with the
four
Gospels
we
presently
possess.
In order
to
inhibit
the
person
from
reading
the
Gospels
literally
or
historically,
sometimes
the
accounts
are
intentionally
different
within
the same
scripture.
Acts 9:7
reads:
“And
the men
which
journeyed
with him
stood
speechless,
hearing
a voice,
but
seeing
no man”.
Yet, in
Acts
22:9,
the
narrative
reads:
“And
they
that
were
with me
saw
indeed
the
light,
and were
afraid;
but they
heard
not the
voice of
him that
spoke to
me”.
In one
verse of
the same
Gospel
they
heard
the
voice
and saw
nothing,
while in
another
verse
they saw
the
light
and
heard
nothing.
Thus,
how can
the
literal
account
be
believed
when
they are
different
even
within
the same
Gospel.
In
analysis,
it means
absolutely
nothing
for the
modern
reader
to
believe
that
Saul was
converted
on the
road to
Damascus
-- there
is no
spiritual
edification
or
uplifting
when we
relate
this
alleged
historical
account
at the
beginning
of our
Common
Era.
And this
fact is
why
the
pre-Nicene
Church
Father
Origen
explained
that
“Scripture
contains
an
unhistorical
element
in-woven
with the
history,
in order
that the
worthlessness
of the
latter
may
drive us
to seek
the
spiritual
meaning”
(Origen
quoted
under
Origen
Adamntius;
The
Encyclopedia
of
Religion
and
Ethics).
And in
the
example
of this
supposed
conversion,
what is
conveyed
spiritually
is of
great
value to
the
disciple
in
search
of the
Inner
Light --
and must
bring
about a
change
of mind
in each
person's
quest to
open the
inner
door to
the
Kingdom.
Thus the
disciple
begins
to see
his own
transformation
from the
death of
faith as
personified
in
Stephen
into to
Saul the
Jew, to
Paul
meaning
the
little
one,
whose
organic
blindness
was
healed
by
Ananias
--
meaning,
the gift
from
God.
Thus,
one of
the
realities
portrayed
in the
change
of
names,
is the
transformation
of the
Jew into
a
"little
one"
-- which
is
necessary
in order
for
man's
organic
blindness
to be
healed
(see
The
Three
Causes
Of Human
Blindness
http://CausalFactor.Nazirene.org#TheThreeCausesOfHumanBlindness
) AND
see also
The
Causal
Factors
And The
Corrupted
Teaching
On
Children
http://CausalFactor.Nazirene.org#TheCorruptedTeachingsOnChildren
) -- a
condition
of mind
that
Jesus
portrays
as:
"You
will be
ever
hearing
but
never
understanding;
you will
be ever
seeing
but
never
perceiving"
(Matt
13:14).
The
reader
is
warned
in John
6:63,
that
reading
the
scriptures
literally
has no
profit
at all (“the
flesh
profiteth
nothing”)
and
leaves
the
reader
spiritually
bankrupt
: "It
is the
spirit
that
quickeneth;
the
flesh
profiteth
nothing:
the
words
that I
speak
unto
you,
they are
spirit,
and they
are
life".
Which is
exactly
what the
Church
Father
Origen
stated
when
portrayed
the
quasi-historical
interpretation
as
"worthless".
It is a
Fact of
Human
Life in
this
shadow-realm
that is
portrayed
in the
parable
of the
prodigal
son as
the Far
Country,
that
unless
you
"turn
about",
and
become a
Child of
the
Kingdom,
you will
remain
spiritually
blind.
Thus,
those
who are
spiritually
blind
see the
scriptures
as
actual
historical
events
-- while
those
whose
blindness
has
begun to
be
resolved,
begins
to see
the
deeper
meaning
of the
spirit.
Therefore,
what the
spiritually
blind
reader
sees as
an
historical
sequence
of
events,
is an
allegorical
portrayal
of the
necessary
steps to
bring
about
their
own
spiritual
transformation
and
restoral
of
Higher
Vision.
But what
is also
demonstrated
is the
fact
that the
account
in Acts
is not
historical,
which
means
that
there
never
was a
person
named
Paul who
was
appointed
as an
Apostle.
That the
Book of
Acts is
not
historical
-- and
there
was no
historical
person
named
Paul --
is why
the
Apostle
Peter
and the
Ebionites
vehemently
opposed
the
Mithraic-Initiates
who
composed
the
alleged
Epistles
of Paul
(see
Was Paul
An
Apostle
Of
Apostate
http://Ebionite.com/Paul.htm
).
Quoting
this
article:
Why did
the
Apostle
Peter
and the
other
disciples
of Jesus
reject
Paul?
Of the
Ebionites
it was
noted by
the
early
Church
writer
Irenaeus:
"Those
who are
called
Ebionites
agree
that the
world
was made
by
God...
they use
the
Gospel
of
Matthew
only,
and
repudiate
the
Apostle
Paul,
maintaining
that he
was an
apostate
from the
Law."
What
this
means is
that the
modern
Church
is
Mithraic
in its
foundation
(see
The
Emergence
Of
Mithraic
Christianity
http://CausalFactor.Nazirene.org#MithraicChristianity
).
This
fact is
noted in
the
Encyclopedia
Britannica
where it
writes:
“In
calling
Paulinism
'Christocentric',
one
raises
the
question
as to
its
relation
to the
Gospel
proclaimed
by
Jesus...
how far
he
unconsciously
modified
the
Gospel
by
making
Christ
its
subject
matter
rather
than its
revealer....
Paul...
put all
into so
fresh a
perspective
as to
change
the
relative
emphasis
on
points
central
to the
teaching
of
Jesus,
and so
alter
its
spirit.
A school
of
writers,
by no
means
unappreciative
of Paul
as they
understand
him, of
whom W.
Wrede
may be
taken as
example,
answer
that
Paul so
changed
Christianity
as to
become
its
'second
founder'
- the
real
founder
of
ecclesiastical
Christianity
as
distinct
from the
Christianity
of
Jesus.
They
say,
'either
Jesus or
Paul' it
cannot
be both
at
once’”.
In not
understanding
that the
Gospels
are not
historical
-- but
rather,
an
allegorical
blueprint
of the
human
mind --
the
modern
Christian
has
unknowingly
embraced
Mithraism,
and in
many
instances
rejected
the
original
Gospel
teachings
which
have
been
restored
at
http://OriginalGospel.Ebionite.com
.
@@@
|
|
|
|
|
The purpose of
the Gospels and
the foundation
of the New
Covenant is to
connect each
person to the
One Teacher as
the Source of
all Knowledge --
and the body of
believers is
proof that the
Churches have
failed in their
mission.
How, the fact
that each group
promotes a
different
doctrine -- and
no authority
within the
Church can
explain why --
demonstrates the
abject failure
of the Church.
What we fail to
realize today is
the fact that
there can be no
divisions and
sects in a
Living Religion
-- where there
is One Leader
and One Teacher
that all genuine
disciples have
access to. By
Divine Decree,
the followers of
Jesus were to
have no
divisions,
sects, or
independent
opinions among
the believers
because the Lord
promised that
each
“…shall hear
my voice; and
there shall be
one fold, and
one shepherd”
(John 10:16). It
is for this
reason the
Apostle
cautioned Titus
to
“Warn a
divisive person
once, and then
warn him a
second time.
After that, have
nothing to do
with him. You
may be sure that
such a man is
warped and
sinful; he is
self-condemned”
(Titus 3:10-11).
The Greek
meaning of the
word divisive is
“one who
promotes a sect”.
It was for this
reason the
religion of the
Messiah/Christ
can have no
worldly name,
and this is seen
in the fact that
it was called
“The Way”.
-- i.e.,
"I worship
the God of our
fathers as a
follower of The
Way"
(Acts 24:14).
TheWay meaning
the path by
which each
follower of
Jesus fulfills
the Gospel and
as the prodigal
son/daughter,
consciously
returns to the
Edenic Kingdom
-- thereby
achieving the
mandate to be in
the world and
not of it --
i.e., Thereby
fulfilling the
statement:
"Assuredly, I
say to you,
there are some
standing here
who shall not
taste death till
they see the Son
of Man coming in
His kingdom"
(Matt
16:28 SEE The
End Times -
Armageddon/Rapture
- The Coming Of
The Kingdom
http://TreeOfLife.Nazirene.org#EndTimes
).
Writing about
schisms and
divisions, the
Church Father
Turtillian
writes:
“On this
point, however,
we dwell no
longer, since it
is the same Paul
who, in his
Epistle to the
Galatians,
counts
'heresies' among
'the sins of the
flesh,' who also
intimates to
Titus, that 'a
man who is a
heretic' must be
'rejected after
the first
admonition,' on
the ground that
'he that is such
is perverted,
and committeth
sin, as a
self-condemned
man.' Indeed, in
almost every
epistle, when
enjoining on us
(the duty) of
avoiding false
doctrines, he
sharply condemns
heresies. Of
these the
practical
effects are
false doctrines,
called in Greek
heresies, a word
used in the
sense of that
choice which a
man makes when
he either
teaches them (to
others) or takes
up with them
(for himself).
For this reason
it is that he
calls the
heretic
self-condemned,
because he has
himself chosen
that for which
he is condemned”.
In the gospel
preached by
Paul, heresy is
considered a
“sin of the
flesh”,
because schisms
and divisions
are the result
of natural man
clinging to
ideas of a
carnal nature.
Why are these
baptized and
committed
Christians
plagued by
schisms and
divisions?
Because they
only call upon
the Lord with
their lips,
while failing to
do as the
Apostle states
by following in
TheWay and
“Put to
death,
therefore,
whatever belongs
to your earthly
nature”
(Col 3:5).
We must
therefore turn
from the
understanding of
the flesh, or in
the words of the
Apostle:
“For to be
carnally minded
is death; but to
be spiritually
minded is life
and peace”
(Rom 8:6). The
religion of
Christ was one
of the spirit --
and Paul taught
the Gentile
believers not to
look to the
historical man
Jesus, but
rather the
indwelling
Spiritual Living
Messiah/Christ
as their savior
and revealer of
truth:
“Therefore
from now on we
recognize no man
according to the
flesh; even
though we have
known Christ
according o the
flesh, yet now
we know Him thus
no longer”
(2 Cor
5:16). This
Spiritual
Messiah/Christ,
over the
historical man
Jesus in the
flesh, was what
biblical scholar
Rudolf Bultmann
was speaking of
when he
concluded that
the
“…Christian
faith is, and
should be,
comparatively
uninterested in
the historical
Jesus and
centered instead
on the
transcendent
Christ”
(Encyclopedia
Britannica).
Every schism and
doctrinal
faction is built
upon an
historical
interpretation
of the Gospels.
So long as
Christians
continue to read
the Gospels as
historical
accounts,
instead of
events and
accounts of the
Mind that opens
the inner
"narrow gate"
of the Kingdom
within (Luke
17:20-21) --
thereby failing
to develop those
inward areas of
the mind that is
necessary to
connect to the
One Teacher (
http://GospelCosmology.Ebionite.com#TheOneTeacher
) -- they will
continue to
remain
spiritually
disenfranchised
and lost on the
"broad-way"
of
self-destruction.
When the Apostle
Peter warned at
the preceding
link that
"...when the
law of God
(scriptures) is
read, it be not
read according
to the
understanding of
our own mind",
that means that
when the Gospels
are interpreted
historically,
then the
interpretation
is carnal and
wrong. And
it is in this
carnal
interpretation
that Paul
portrayed as
being the victim
of the
"letter that
killeth [and]
Jewish
folktales"
(see 2 Cor 3:6;
Titus 1:14).
Once a person
has become
mentally locked
into a belief or
mindset,
regardless of
the facts
presented or the
intellectual
arguments to
support the
facts are made,
it is extremely
difficult to
convey the facts
to them in a
rational and
intelligent
manner that they
will accept. In
most instances,
they will attack
the messenger
instead of
examining the
facts. And if
these people are
members of a
group -- either
church or
philosophical/cultural
school of
thinking -- it
is virtually
impossible to
open their minds
to embrace the
facts.
Therefore,
unless a Fact or
a Truth is made
appropriate to
the thinking of
the people it is
intended to
reach, then its
propagation will
be useless.
The Words of the
Devil: In
the above I
demonstrate that
there is only
One Teacher for
the people of
the New
Covenant.
The greatest error of the Gentile-Church
which portrayed itself as Orthodox, was
made when they attached their religion to
the Old Testament of the Jews -- portraying
the Jews as the forerunner of the Church.
Why did the Church do this? To
provide the Church with a false and
counterfeit facade of
authenticity -- but what is known as
Replacement Theology has been one of the
primary causes of the demise of Christianity.
Yet, the Gospel account of Jesus correctly portrays the
Jews as the offspring of the Devil when the
question is
posed by Jesus:
"Why
do you not
understand what
I say? It is
because you
cannot bear to
hear my word"
As to why the
Jews could not
understand
spiritual
teachings and
concepts, Jesus
explained:
"You
belong to your
father, the
devil, and you
want to carry
out his desires.
He was a
murderer from
the beginning,
refusing to
uphold the
truth, because
there is no
truth in him.
When he lies, he
speaks his
native language,
because he is a
liar and the
father of lies" (John
8:43-44).
To understand
the words as
translated in
the Berean Study
Bible where it
reads:
"...When he
lies, he speaks
his native
language",
what is not at
all understood
is that all the
words and
languages of
mankind --
because of their
carnal
foundation that
is a one-sided
fragment of the
Wholeness of the
Higher Spiritual
Language of the
Soul, all the
words that man
speaks with his
human voice can
be defined as a
lie, because of
its lack of
wholeness.
As stated above,
The Encyclopedia
Britannica
quotes Philo of
Alexandria with
respect to the Essenes and
Therapute:
"They read the
Holy Scriptures,
from which they
sought wisdom by
treating them as
allegorical,
believing that
the words of the
literal text
were symbols of
something
hidden”.
In the same way
that the above
quoted statement
of Jerome
regarding the
Gospels written
in Biblical
Hebrew
Characters that
"...and its text
they related
some one way and
some another",
parallels the
above statement
how the Essene/Therapeute
...read the
Holy Scriptures,
from which they
sought wisdom by
treating them as
allegorical,
believing that
the words of the
literal text
were symbols of
something
hidden”.
And it is
important to
recognize that
these statements
when placed side
by side confirm
the statement of
the Apostle
Peter as quoted
by his disciple
Clement in the
Homilies that
"...therefore
great care is to
be taken, that
when the law of
God is read, it
be not read
according to the
understanding of
our own mind.
For there are
many sayings in
the divine
Scriptures which
can be drawn to
that sense which
every one has
preconceived for
himself; and
this ought not
to be done. For
you ought not to
seek a foreign
and extraneous
sense, which you
have brought
from without".
Again, quoting
the Berean Study
Bible for 1 Cor
2:12-13 where it
states:
"We have not
received the
spirit of the
world, but the
Spirit who is
from God, that
we may
understand what
God has freely
given us.
And this
is what we
speak, not in
words taught us
by human wisdom,
but in words
taught by the
Spirit,
expressing
spiritual truths
in spiritual
words."
It is impossible
to convey
"spiritual
truths"
in the language
of man which is
portrayed above
as the words
presented in the
"native
language"
of the Devil.
Why is the
languages of
mankind the
words of the
Devil?
What is
portrayed in the
foregoing as
symbols
of something
hidden”
which
"...text they
related some one
way and some
another",
when understood
in Wholeness --
drawing from the
Intuitive
Spheres of Mind
the meaning that
the Logos/True
Prophet provides
for the symbols
-- presents to
the
seeker/disciple
the
"...words
taught by the
Spirit,
expressing
spiritual truths
in spiritual
words."
When the
Apostle Peter in
the Homilies of
his disciple
Clement is
quoted as
commanding that,
"...when the law
of God
(scriptures) is
read, it be not
read according
to the
understanding of
our own mind"
-- because of
the lack of
Wholeness, all
interpretations
of the
scriptures
"...according to
the
understanding of
our own mind",
must be
understood as
incomplete and
defined as the
lies, [of the
Devil's] native
language".
And all the
doctrines which
Christians
attempt to teach
other Christians
the
interpretative-meaning
of the
scriptures --
holding bible
study to teach
the meaning --
using
commentaries
that present
"...a foreign
and extraneous
sense, which you
have brought
from without",
are all based
upon the words
and
understanding of
mankind that
lacks the
necessary
Wholeness to
comprehend the
spiritual
meaning of the
scriptures.
Anyone who
attempts to
teach another
person the
meaning and
interpretation
of the
scriptures, is a
minister and
servant of the
Anti-Christ.
Why? Because
when you teach
the
interpretative-meaning
of the
scriptures as is
done in many
Bible study
groups, you
negate the
embedded
symbols, and
inhibit the
catalysts that
are designed to
overcome the
person's
Spiritual
Amnesia --
thereby
defeating the
very purpose of
the scriptures.
Moreover, by
undermining the
purpose of the
embedded symbols
and catalysts
when you teach a
person the
meaning of the
scriptures, you
are inhibiting
that person from
connecting with
the Inner Source
of Knowledge
within them,
which is one of
the primary
objectives of
the New Covenant
teachings.
The Spiritual
Castration Of
The Gospels:
Spiritually
immature people
always attempt
to interpret the
scriptures
outwardly --
i.e., literally
and historically
-- thereby
throwing away
the Key of
Knowledge (
http://KeyOfKnowledge.org
). An
Important Truth
is contained in
the Epistle of
Peter to James
where it is
stated:
"Hear me,
brethren and
fellow-servants.
If we should
give the books
to all
indiscriminately,
and they should
be corrupted by
any daring men,
or be perverted
by
interpretations,
as you have
heard that some
have already
done,
it will
remain even for
those who really
seek the truth,
always to wander
in error.
Wherefore it is
better that they
should be with
us, and that we
should
communicate them
with all the
fore-mentioned
care to those
who wish to
live piously,
and to save
others."
Those Gentiles
outside of the
original
Ebionite/Nazirene
core of
disciples and
followers of
Jesus, were
quick to corrupt
all the copies
of the
scriptures that
were given to
them. And this
fact is
confirmed to us
by Dr. F. H.
Scrivener where
he writes that:
"In the second
century we have
seen too many
instances of
attempts to
tamper with the
text of
Scripture, some
merely
injudicious,
others
positively
dishonest".
Scrivener
states that
"it is no
less true to
fact than
paradoxical in
sound, that the
worst
corruptions to
which the New
Testament has
ever been
subjected,
originated
within 100 years
after it was
composed: and
that Irenaeus
and the African
Fathers, and the
whole Western,
with a portion
of the Syrian
Church"
used inferior
manuscripts (F.H.
Scrivener,
Introduction to
the Criticism of
the New
Testament).
Dean Burgon
quotes Gaius
(AD175-200) who
speaks of the
source of
corruptions that
survive in the
early papyri:
"The Divine
Scriptures these
heretics have
audaciously
corrupted.
Laying violent
hands upon them,
under pretense
of correcting
them"
(Burgon, The
Revision
Revised, p.
323). Eusebius
(Eccleastical
History), citing
the second
century Church
Father Clement
of Alexandria:
"The worst
corruptions to
which the New
Testament has
ever been
subjected
originated
within one
hundred years
after it was
composed."
In the words of
Colwell (What is
the Best New
Testament Text?,
p.119)
"The first two
centuries
witnessed the
creations of the
large number of
variations known
to scholars
today. In the
manuscripts of
the New
Testament most
variations, I
believe, were
made
deliberately."
G.D.
Kilpatrick
(Atticism and
the Text of the
Greek New
Testament, pp
125-131):
"Deliberate
changes in all
text types
appear to
antedate A.D.
200..as distinct
from errors...
all categories
of deliberate
alteration...
are present in
both groups.
Tatian is the
last author of
make deliberate
changes. The
vast majority of
deliberate
changes were
older then A.D.
200. They came
into being in
the period A.D.
50-200."
The truth and
the facts of the
matter is very
clearly
expressed in the
words of Prof.
Bart D. Ehrman
in his book,
The Orthodox
Corruption of
Scripture,
where he warns
us that:
"...theological
disputes,
specifically
disputes over
Christology,
prompted
Christian
scribes to alter
the words of
scripture in
order to make
them more
serviceable for
the polemical
task. Scribes
modified their
manuscripts to
make them more
patently
‘orthodox’ and
less susceptible
to ‘abuse’ by
the opponents of
orthodoxy"
-- which
orthodoxy was to
bring the text
of the Bible
into conformity
with the
doctrines and
tenets of the
Church of the
Roman Emperor
Constantine.
With regard to
the condition of
the Bible we
presently use:
In his book
The Text of the
New Testament,
Dr. Vincent
Taylor writes
that
"The manuscripts
of the New
Testament
preserve traces
of two kinds of
dogmatic
alterations:
those which
involve the
elimination or
alteration of
what was
regarded as
doctrinally
unacceptable or
inconvenient,
and those which
introduce into
the Scriptures
proof for a
favorite
theological
tenet or
practice".
To put Dr.
Taylor's words
in perspective:
What Dr. Taylor
is stating is
that, whatever
doctrine Jesus
taught which the
Church of the
Roman Empire did
not agree with,
there is
overwhelming
evidence that
the church
corrupters
removed what was
objectionable
from their
perspective.
It can be easily
understood why
the Ebionite/Nazirene
disciples of
Jesus not only
did not give the
Greek converts
who edited and
corrupted the
text of their
scriptures, but
they also
withheld the
most spiritual
and important
scriptures to be
preserved only
in their care.
Thus, Peter
writes to James:
"Knowing, my
brother, your
eager desire
after that which
is for the
advantage of us
all, I beg and
beseech you not
to communicate
to any one of
the Gentiles the
books of my
preachings which
I sent to you,
nor to any one
of our own tribe
before trial;
but if any one
has been proved
and found
worthy, then to
commit them to
him, after the
manner in which
Moses delivered
his books to the
Seventy who
succeeded to his
chair.
Wherefore also
the fruit of
that caution
appears even
till now. For
his countrymen
keep the same
rule of monarchy
and polity
everywhere,
being unable in
any way to think
otherwise, or to
be led out of
the way of the
much-indicating
Scriptures. For,
according to the
rule delivered
to them,
they endeavor to
correct the
discordances of
the Scriptures,
if any one,
haply not
knowing the
traditions, is
confounded at
the various
utterances of
the prophets.
Wherefore they
charge no one to
teach, unless he
has first
learned how the
Scriptures must
be used. And
thus they have
amongst
them one God,
one law, one
hope" (see
Epistle Of Peter
And James).
When Peter wrote
to Jacob/James
that
"...they
endeavor to
correct the
discordances of
the Scriptures,
if any one,
haply not
knowing the
traditions, is
confounded at
the various
utterances of
the prophets"
-- the
discordances and
inconsistencies,
as well as the
historical
untruths, all of
which were
intentionally
inserted into
the text for an
ultra-important
reason. And
with the removal
of these
discordances by
the scribes of
the Gentile
Church, the
scriptures
suffered a loss
of their
effectiveness in
relation to
their true
purpose and
objective. But
just as
important is the
statement that
"...Wherefore
they charge no
one to teach,
unless he has
first learned
how the
Scriptures must
be used".
And herein lies
the problem: The
modern Christian
is absolutely
clueless as to
"...how the
Scriptures must
be used"!!!
And thus,
because of this
state of abject
ignorance in
conjunction with
the editing and
removal of what
is portrayed as
the discordances
and many of the
most important
original Gospel
teachings, the
Church has
rendered the
study of the
Gospels
virtually
worthless. In
the words of the
Church Father
Origen:
“Scripture
contains an
unhistorical
element in-woven
with the
history, in
order that the
worthlessness of
the latter may
drive us to seek
the spiritual
meaning”
(Origen quoted
under Origen
Adamntius; The
Encyclopedia of
Religion and
Ethics). The
authors of the
scriptures did
not compose
historical
accounts -- but
because of the
inability of the
faith-based
believers to
comprehend their
own higher Soul
and Spiritual
reality, the
faith-based
Christians
possess no
understanding
that authors
used a
quasi-historical
cloak to
allegorically
present
important
teachings and
concepts that
could not be
comprehended by
the human
organic
"natural"
level of mind.
And what Peter
portrays as the
"discordances"
of the
scriptures --
what Origen
correctly
portrays as the
"...unhistorical
element in-woven
with the
history"
-- not only
inhibits the
person from
reading the
scriptures
literally/historically
-- but in most
instances
presents an
ultra-important
spiritual
truth. But when
the faith-based
Gentile Church
attempted to
correct these
discordances and
unhistorical
events, they
ignorantly
inhibited the
process of
mental expansion
and spiritual
development
which was and is
the primary
purpose the
scriptures were
written. And
with the editing
and corrupting
of the
scriptures, this
caused them to
remain
permanently
bound to what
the Church
Father Origen
portrayed as the
fate of the
immature
Christian when
he stated that
the elementary
"testimony"
of Christ was
“...preached
in the Churches
…for the
simpleminded and
for the ears of
the common crowd
who are led on
to live better
lives by their
belief”
(see
Origen, Contra
Celsum).
Leading a better
life was the
beginning of the
Gospel teachings
-- evolving and
becoming
spiritually
transformed was
the primary
objective.
To the people
who Paul had
taught the
Gospel message,
Paul confessed
that
"And I,
brethren, could
not speak to you
as to spiritual
men, but as to
men of flesh, as
to babes in
Christ"
(1 Cor 3:1) --
yet, he also
stated that
"However, we
speak wisdom
among them that
are perfect: yet
not the wisdom
of this world,
nor of the
princes of this
world, that come
to nothing"
(1 Cor 2:6).
In their
original
condition and
format, the
scriptures were
designed to
evolve those who
Paul portrays as
being of an
organic
"natural"
human
consciousness
(see
Animal-Soul),
into the
"spiritually
mature/perfect"
transformed
consciousness
that enables the
seeker/disciple
to receive the
Divine Manna
directly form
the Indwelling
Logos/Son of
God. And with
respect to the
true purpose and
objective of the
scriptures, the
statement of
Peter's that is
not at all
understood today
-- i.e,
"...Wherefore
they charge no
one to teach,
unless he has
first learned
how the
Scriptures must
be used"
-- is parallel
to a statement
of Peter in the
Homilies of his
disciple Clement
where Peter is
quoted as
explaining with
respect to a
discussion on
the nature of
the scriptures
when Simon Magus
stated to Peter:
“Then said
Simon: 'You are
manifestly
avoiding the
hearing of the
charge from the
Scriptures
against your
God.'"
To which
Peter then
replied:
"'You yourself
appear to me to
be doing this;
for he who
avoids the
order of inquiry,
does not wish a
true
investigation to
be made. Hence
I, who proceed
in an orderly
manner, and wish
that the writer
should first be
considered, am
manifestly
desirous to walk
in a straight
path’”.
What, then, the
intelligent
seeker must ask,
is the order of
inquiry? In
these words are
noted the most
profound error
of both Bible
believers as
well as the
critics today
who only
perceive what is
literally
written in the
narrative of the
written word.
Believers see
and read the
scriptures in
the manner
predicated by
their predefined
doctrines of
belief, while
ignoring the
very warning of
the scriptures
that it is their
own perception
of the Word that
is in error.
Simon Magus
wants to engage
Peter and use
the scriptures
to prove that
the world was
created by a
lesser god.
Peter states
that
By Design,
anyone can prove
almost any
doctrine by
using the
scriptures --
and therefore,
before the
scriptures can
be understood,
the
“writer
should first be
considered”
-- which means
that unless you
read the
scriptures in
accord with
their original
intended
purpose, you
render the
scriptures
worthless.
Quoting one of
the opening
statements above
in the heading
of this article:
"...the
scriptures are
exactly what the
original authors
intended them to
be".
And if the
person fails to
first understand
"...how the
Scriptures must
be used",
whatever
interpretation
they embrace
will be in grave
error.
The Creation Of
The Jesus God:
The vast
majority of
Gentiles were
imbued with
Mithraic based
thinking, and
they worshiped
Mithra as the
sun-god who is
reborn every
Dec. 25th, and
resurrected
every Easter
(Ishtar).
They therefore
believed that
Jesus was the
latest (semi-human)
incarnation of Mithra, and the
Gospels were an
historical
account of the
birth of the
sun-god in human
form who was
rejected by the
Jews, and was
restored to his
rightful place
as the god of
the Gentiles.
Mithrasm in the
Roman Empire
during the 2nd
and 3rd
centuries was
expressed by the
people in their
"loyalty to the
emperor."
Among
the vast
majority of
people there was
no thought of
scriptures begin
written as a
catalyst to
achieve
mental-expansion
and
spiritual-deepening.
And that all the
Gospel teachings
that expressed
the need to
bring about
spiritual
maturity were
edited out,
removed, or
corrupted --
i.e., thus
the words of
Prof. Bart D.
Ehrman where he
warns us that:
"...theological
disputes,
specifically
disputes over
Christology,
prompted
Christian
scribes to alter
the words of
scripture in
order to make
them more
serviceable for
the polemical
task. Scribes
modified their
manuscripts to
make them more
patently
‘orthodox’ and
less susceptible
to ‘abuse’ by
the opponents of
orthodoxy."
The (Mithraic)
Gentile
Christians who
read the Gospels
as historical,
were of a
Serf/Subject
mindset where
salvation was
achieved by
believing in the
Royal Family as
portrayed in
Constantine's
doctrine of the
Trinity.
Thus, this
self-perception
was in conflict
with the parable
of the prodigal
son, which can
be seen
portrayed in
Gospel of Thomas
saying 50 which
states:
"Jesus said,
If they say to
you (plur.),
'Where are you
from?' say to
them, 'It is
from light that
we have come -
from the place
where light, of
its own accord
alone, came into
existence and
[stood at rest].
And it has been
shown forth in
their image.' If
they say to you,
'Is it you?' say
'We are its
offspring, and
we are the
chosen of the
living father.'
If they ask you,
'What is the
sign of your
father within
you?' say to
them, 'It is
movement and
repose.'"
When rightly
understood, the
foregoing is
parallel to the
statement by
Jesus when he
said
"And do not call
anyone on earth
'father,' for
you have one
Father, and he
is in heaven"
(Matt 23:9)
-- and
"Go instead
to my brothers
and tell them,
'I am returning
to my Father and
your Father, to
my God and your
God'"
(John 20:17 NIV).
That the vast
majority of
people fail to
possess
Soul-Memory, and
as the prodigal
sons and
daughters they
don't remember
when they began
their journey
when they left
the Kingdom of
their Heavenly
Father,
is because
mankind is
presently
dwelling in the
"outer
darkness"
of mind and
being, and have
been stricken
with spiritual
amnesia and
blindness (see
Soul-Evolution -
Reincarnation
And
Soul-Development
http://OriginalGospel.Ebionite.com#SoulEvolution
).
And while the
Gospels were
designed to
develop the mind
of the
seeker/disciple,
and restore
their
Soul-Memory (see
Spiritual
Amnesia
http://AnInconvenientTruth.org#SpiritualAmnesia
), with the
editing and
corruption of
the Gospels by
the Gentile
Church -- along
with the removal
of the most
important
spiritual
teachings -- the
Christian world
was plunged into
a self-imposed
Spiritual
Diaspora.
While modern
Biblical
scholars
basically told
the people the
truth, the
truth was and
remains
unacceptable to
the multitude of
Churches and
faith-based
believers.
Quoting from
Examination of
Modern NT Text
Criticism:
"Where
history records
that true sacred
text survived
this assault and
is preserved in
the traditional
text, Westcott
and Hort counter
that the whole
church
participated in
a conspiracy to
fabricate a
blended (and
therefore
corrupted) text.
Westcott and
Hort must not
have believed
the traditional
Christian church
to be genuine,
but a sham. This
thesis is
supported by the
biographies of
Westcott and
Hort. When J. F.
D. Maurice was
accused of false
doctrine,
Westcott
commented that
Orthodox
Christians are
like a new Islam
persecuting a
revival of the
true
Christians."
The massive
corruption of
biblical texts
went to the very
core of the
Gospels -- i.e.,
“In order to
make the
previously
despised cult of
the Early
Christians
acceptable to
Constantine,
emperor of Rome
– the new
(pagan) Church
Fathers had to
remove from its
teachings
certain
doctrines which
they knew were
objectionable to
Constantine. To
accomplish this,
certain
‘correctors’
were appointed,
whose task it
was to rewrite
the Gospels”
(Apollonius the
Nazarene Part 1:
The Historical
Apollonius
Versus the
Mythical Jesus
By: Dr. R. W.
Bernard, Ph.D.).
"Theological
disputes over
the trinity
prompted
Christian
scribes to alter
the words of
scripture in
order to make
them more
serviceable”
(The Orthodox
Corruption of
Scripture BY
Prof. Bart D.
Ehrman).
“After the
Council of Nicea,
A.D. 325, the
manuscripts
of the New
Testament were
considerably
tampered with by
scholars, called
`correctores‘,
who were
appointed by
the ecclesiastical
authorities, and
actually
commissioned
to correct the
text of the
Scriptures in
the interest of
what was
considered
orthodoxy”
(Archdeacon
Wilberforce).
“What these `correctores‘
did was to cut
out of the
Gospels with
minute care,
certain
teachings of our
Lord which they
did not propose
to follow”
(Gospel
of the Holy
Twelve by Rev.
G. J. Ouseley).
One of the most
common biblical
manuscripts used
to make our
modern English
translations is
known today as
the Nestle Text.
Yet it was Prof.
Eberhard Nestle
himself who
warned us in his
Einfhrung in die
Textkritik des
griechischen
Testaments:
"Learned men, so
called
Correctores
were, following
the church
meeting at Nicea
325 AD, selected
by the church
authorities to
scrutinize the
sacred texts and
rewrite them in
order to correct
their meaning in
accordance with
the views which
the church had
just
sanctioned."
Why can the
adoption of the
corrupted
scriptures be
portrayed as
"...a
conspiracy to
fabricate a
blended (and
therefore
corrupted) text"?
Because the
Roman Emperor
Constantine
orchestrated a
massive adoption
of Christianity
as the Universal
Religion of the
Empire -- which
brought about
the massive
conversion of
Mithraic
sun-worshippers
and pagans
into the Roman
Church. Jesus
was portrayed as
the latest
incarnation of
the Mithraic
sun-god that was
born on December
25 -- which is
when the sun
begins to move
northward from
the southern
hemisphere.
Constantine took
the most corrupt
New Testament
scriptures and
further edited
and corrupted
them to make
them support the
dogma of
Mithraism which
represented the
common beliefs
of the people.
The original
Ebionite
Nazirene
disciples and
followers of
Jesus were
condemned as
heretics --
portrayed as
"too Jewish"
to understand
the meaning of
the Gospel --
i.e.,
“…rejected from
one religion as
apostates, and
from the other
as heretics”
(Gibbon: Decline
& Fall of the
Roman Empire,
v.1, p.416).
Further, the
Spiritual
(Gentile)
Christians who
understood the
important
purpose of the
scriptures as a
catalyst to
develop the mind
and enable the
seeker/believer
to begin to
receive the
Divine Manna of
the Kingdom,
were condemned
as Gnostic
heretics --
hunted down,
their scriptures
destroyed and
those who did
not embrace the
religion of the
emperor, were
put to death.
Resulting in the
fact that the
whole foundation
of the modern
Church which is
based upon
Original Sin,
has been
imported from
the Mithraic
based teachings
of the Iranian
prophet Mani, in
order to explain
and fill the
great void that
the Church
suppression of
important
teachings on the
pre-existent
soul created
(see
Original Sin).
Thereby creating
a pagan
foundation to
the Church that
has rendered
Christianity
spiritually
impotent. Further
quoting from
Examination of
Modern NT Text
Criticism:
"Westcott and
Hort must have
believed that
what historians
recorded as a
defense against
heretics was in
reality a
suppression of
the true church.
They believed
that what the
historians
recorded as
heretically
corrupted texts
were closer to
the true
autographs."
And this
statement is
true beyond the
comprehension of
the modern
believer. The
more pure the
copy of the
Gospels, the
more offensive
it was from the
perspective of
the dogma and
religion of the
emperor.
Traditionally,
reality has been
what sectarian
and secular
leaders have
said it is. To
oppose these
pseudo-authorities
of both church
and state, is to
be condemned and
rejected as a
heretic -- which
often carried
the sentence of
death. These
sectarian and
secular leaders'
primary goal was
to preserve
their own
positions as
religious and
political
authority over
the people.
And throughout
man's past,
religion was one
of the primary
tools that was
used by secular
rulers to
maintain
unquestioned
authority over
the people. In
the case of the
Christian Church
beginning in the
fourth century,
to disagree with
the doctrines
affirmed by the
Emperor
Constantine,
carried with it
the sentence of
death. Thus,
Gibbon writes in
the Decline and
Fall of the
Roman Empire:
”Constantine
easily believed
that the
heretics, who
presumed to
dispute his
opinions or to
oppose his
commands, were
guilty of the
most absurd and
criminal
obstinancy...
Not a moment was
lost in
excluding the
ministers and
teachers of the
separated
congregations
from any share
of the rewards
and immunities
which the
emperor had so
liberally
bestowed on the
orthodox clergy.
But as the
sectaries might
still exist
under the cloud
of royal
disgrace, the
conquest of the
East was
immediately
followed by an
edict which
announced their
total
destruction”.
Thus, in the
same way that
whoever did not
embrace the
religion of the
emperor met with
the sentence of
death, whatever
scriptures did
not conform to
the approved
version, was
immediately
destroyed (see
http://BibleCorruption.com
).
What this means
is that neither
modern day
believers,
non-believers,
accepted
scholars or
critics, have
absolutely any
idea what Jesus
really taught --
as well as the
esoteric
knowledge
possessed by his
disciples --
because the only
thing that
remains today,
is the doctrines
of the Church of
Constantine.
Jesus did not
intentionally
hide or conceal
anything from
the multitude of
people who could
only be taught
in parables --
just like there
is nothing
intentionally
hidden or
concealed in the
allegorical text
of the
scriptures --
but rather,
those whose body
and minds
function from an
earth
vibrational
frequency,
cannot perceive
and understand
the higher
truths that can
only be
comprehended by
those who have
brought about
the necessary
Wholeness within
their own mind
and being.
Thus, to his
disciples Jesus
said:
“Unto you it
is given to know
the mystery of
the kingdom of
God: but unto
them that are
without, all
these things are
done in
parables: That
seeing they may
see, and not
perceive; and
hearing they may
hear, and not
understand”
(Mark
4:11-12 KJV).
Those who are
"without",
are those who
dwell in what
Jesus called the
"outer
darkness"
of mind and
being (see
http://OuterDarkness.Nazirene.org
).
The Corruption
Of The Words God
Spoken To
Mankind:
The pre-Nicene
biblical texts
and the earliest
of Church
writers prove
that at the
baptism of Jesus
in the Jordan
river, the voice
of God said: "Thou
art my Son, this
day have I
begotten thee"
(see
http://TheTenWords.com
). What this
means is that on
the day that
Jesus was
baptized, he
became the
Anointed
(Messiah/Christ)
for the first
time. The Adam
Clark Commentary
with regard to
the passage at
Hebrews 1:5
which quotes the
Original Words
that God spoke
to Mankind
states that if
this quotation
used by Paul and
also in the Book
of Acts is true
with respect to
the words spoken
of Jesus, then
“...the whole
Christian system
is vain and
baseless"
-- and thus,
when the Church
corrupted the
Words
spoken to
mankind by God,
the congregation
of believers
were cast into a
Spiritual
Diaspora which
they have yet to
escape.
What is the
evidence that
the above is the
true Words that
God spoke to
mankind? In
addition to the
most ancient
copies of the
Gospels, this
wording which
reflected the
original
non-corrupted
Words of God to
Mankind is found
in the writings
of six (6)
pre-Nicene
Church Fathers who copied the
statements of
God into their
own writings
(see
The Gentile
Church Witness).
What this means
is that what the
original
pre-Nicene
Gospels
therefore stated
was that Jesus
was a holy man
who became the
Anointed
(Messiah/Christ)
at his baptism
in the Jordan.
And the fact
that the copies
of the
scriptures that
were used prior
to the fourth
century by the
Church Fathers
reflect the
original words
of God,
demonstrate that
it was the Roman
Emperor
Constantine who
was a Mithraic
sun-worshipper,
demanded that
the words spoken
by God to
mankind be
changed to make
them reflect the
doctrines of
Mithraism.
Constantine
believed that
Jesus was the
latest
incarnation of
the Mithraic
sun-god, and
that the
original
disciples of
Jesus and the
Spiritual
Christians were
wrong.
In order to
prove and
confirm that the
Mithraic infused
doctrines of the
Church was not
true, the Hand
of God moved and
we are provided
the witness of
the The
Essenes And The
Dead Sea
Scrolls http://OriginalGospel.Ebionite.com#Essene --
which the Church
has continued to
totally
ignored. As
just one example
of the facts
that have been
confirmed, is
the witness of
Prof. John
Allegro who was
quoted as saying
that what has
been revealed in
the discovery of
the Dead Sea
Scrolls is a
great amount of
overwhelming
evidence that
“...may
upset a great
many basic
teachings of the
Christian
Church. This in
turn would
greatly upset
many Christian
Theologians and
believers. The
heart of the
matter is, in
fact, the source
and originality
of Christian
doctrine” (August
1966 issue of
Harpers
Magazine). What
all the many
recent
archaeological
discoveries have
confirmed and
demonstrated is
that Prof.
Allegro was
correct in his
assertion that
our modern-day
understanding
of “the
source and
originality of
Christian
doctrine” is
defective -- and
the doctrines of
the modern
Church have
virtually
nothing in
common with the
Original Gospel
teachings (see http://OriginalGospel.Ebionite.com ).
Those who walked
and talked daily
with the man
Jesus, had
nothing in
common with the
Mithraic based
doctrines of the
modern Church.
Why? Because
their
understanding
was in perfect
harmony with the
Words that God
spoke to mankind
at Jesus'
baptism in the
Jordan.
Historically,
those who were
taught directly
by the man Jesus
understood that
he was a Holy
Man who
fulfilled the
Law within his
own Mind and
Being, and
became At-One
with the
Indwelling Logos
(aka Son of
God). These
original
disciples and
followers of
Jesus who walked
and talked with
him daily, were
known as Ebionites
and Nazirenes http://OriginalGospel.Ebionite.com#Ebionite --
meaning the "poor
ones" to
the thinking and
ways of this
world who strove
to fulfill the
adage to be in
the world and
not of it. In
the same way
that Jesus
taught that he
was our brother
-- i.e., "Go
instead to my
brothers and
tell them, 'I am
returning to my
Father and your
Father, to my
God and your
God'" (John
20:17) -- and
his disciples
understood that
Jesus became the
Anointed
(Messiah/Christ)
by fulfilling
the spiritual
meaning and
essence of the
Law within his
own mind and
being -- i.e.,
quoting the
Church writer
Hippolytus on
the Ebionites:
that Jesus "...was
justified by
fulfilling the
Law. He was the
Christ of God,
since not one of
the rest of
mankind had
observed the Law
completely. Had
any one else
fulfilled the
commandments of
the Law, he
would have been
the Christ,
for they assert
that our Lord
Himself was a
man in like
sense with all
humanity" (see
Hippolytus,
Refut. Omn. Haer.
vii. 34). One
of the most
important
elements to this
original
teaching was not
only that Jesus
was a man who
became of an
Enlightened
Anointed Mind
(Christ/Messiah)
by fulfilling
the Law within
his own mind and
being, but also
that if "...any
one else
fulfilled the
commandments of
the Law, he
would have been
the Christ" --
and this
ultra-important
teaching is
reflective of
the Words that
God spoke to
mankind when the
man Jesus became
the first of the
prodigal sons to
become At-One
with the
Indwelling
Logos/Son of God
- which set the
example and
standard for all
other prodigal
sons and
daughters to
follow. With
respect to the
Ebionites, it is
documented that
the mother and
brothers of
Jesus were
Ebionites -- and
because they
were faithful to
the words that
God spoke to
mankind, the
historian
portrays them as
being “…rejected
from one
religion as
apostates, and
from the other
as heretics” (Gibbon:
Decline & Fall
of the Roman
Empire, v.1,
p.416). Anyone
who embraces the
Original
Teachings of the
Gospel today,
will be rejected
and banned from
the Churches
(see The
Reality Of The
Original
Gospels http://OriginalGospel.Ebionite.com ).
Turn About And
Become As a
Child:
In the Gospels,
Jesus places
particular
attention and
importance on
Children who are
often referred
to as the
"little ones".
Believers are
warned that if
they fail to
"turn about",
and become as a
child, they
cannot enter
into the kingdom
of heaven (Mt
18:3; 19:14).
But this
provokes a
number of
important
questions: What
does it mean to
"turn about",
and become as a
child?
The Question:
Did the Original
Gospel teachings
survive beyond
the first
century?
It is easily
demonstrated
that the first
century
Christians
understood an
important
spiritual
concept that is
totally foreign
to the modern
believer (see
The Gospel
Enigma That
Modern
Christians Can't
Comprehend
http://GospelOfThomas.Nazirene.org#GospelEnigma
). And it is
demonstrated
that the Gospel
of Thomas saying
22 was at one
time the
foundational
centerpiece of
Gospel teachings
on the End Times
and the Coming
of the Kingdom.
The question was
posed to Jesus
by his
disciples:
"Shall we then,
as children,
enter the
kingdom?"
Which should
provoke the
questions: Why
were the
disciples of
Jesus portrayed
as
"children"?
Jesus taught
that unless you
are
"born again",
it will remain
impossible to
enter the
Kingdom. At the
subheading
entitled The
Importance Of
The Children
http://BrotherOfYeshua.com/children.htm#importance
, it is
demonstrated the
extent of the
massive
corruption in
all four Gospels
that was brought
about to remove
certain
important
teachings on the
Children.
Which raises the question:
What was it
about the
teachings on the
children that
offended the
dogma of that
part of the
Church that
portrayed itself
as Orthodox? It
was spiritually
noted to me that
when the Church
corrupted the
Gospels, the
remnants of the
teaching on the
Children could
easily prove
that the Gospels
had been both
corrupted, and
important
teachings
removed. Which
means that
because the
remnant of
corruption is so
easily detected,
that virtually
anyone can open
any translation
of the Gospels
and easily
confirm that an
important
teaching that is
paramount to
entering the
Kingdom had been
corrupted and
removed.
In the case of
the Gospel of
Luke, there are
presently eight
chapters
separating the
initial
reference to the
children in Luke
9:47-48, with
the remaining
verses
pertaining to
the children
which now are
found in the
seventeenth
chapter at Luke
17:48. And
anyone who
believes that
the author of
Luke wrote the
Gospel with
seven (7)
chapters
dividing and
separating the
teaching on the
children -- or
that, the
proverbial Hand
of God protected
the Gospels from
being corrupted
-- or, that it
doesn't matter
that the reader
understand this
teaching with
enough depth to
fulfill it in
their lives --
is simply
mentally numb.
And the fact
that this
corruption of
the Gospel is so
easily detected,
means that no
one has an
excuse -- and
any Bible reader
can prove the
editing of the
teachings on the
children using
any Bible that
exits today.
It was
also pointed out
that because of
this easily
discernable
remnant, that
all Christians
are responsible
for not pointing
out the massive
corruption of
the Gospels --
and demanding
that they be
provided pure
original copies
of the Gospel
(see Can I Get
An Original Pure
Copy Of The
Scriptures
http://OriginalGospel.Ebionite.com#PureCopyOfScriptures
).
If we pose the
question as to
what teaching
was of such
importance that
it had to be
totally removed
from the
canonical
Gospels? The
answer can be
found at the
subheading: The
Missing Verse
Removed From The
Gospels
http://BrotherOfYeshua.com/children.htm#TheMissingVerse
. And while it
was a simple
message, the
teaching
supported the
original
foundational
paradigm of the
Gospel teachings
which totally
undermined the
corrupted
doctrines of the
fourth century
Church of Rome.
And this
suppressed
teaching read:
"For there
are some
children, which
were so born
from their
mother's womb;
And there are
some who God
returned, and
were made the
children of men;
And there be
children, who
have made
themselves
children for the
kingdom of
heaven's sake."
But to
understand the
significance of
this suppressed
teaching, you
must understand
why Jesus placed
such emphasis on
"turning
about",
and becoming a
child -- even
warning in
Mt 18:6 and Mk
9:42 where it is
stated that:
"But whosoever
shall offend one
of these little
ones who believe
in me, it were
better for him
that a millstone
were hanged
about his neck,
and that he were
drowned in the
depth of the
sea".
When the
teaching on the
children is
understood, the
question must be
asked: In view
of the removed
teaching, does
this warning
apply to those
who are children
from their
mother's womb?
Or does this
message of
severity apply
to those
"...who have
made themselves
children for the
kingdom of
heaven's sake"?
You must further
understand the
significance of
Jesus' answer to
the disciples in
the Gospel of
Thomas when they
posed the
question:
"Shall we then,
as children,
enter the
kingdom?"
And then
understand
Jesus' answer
when he replied:
Jesus said to
them, "When you
make the two
one, and when
you make the
inside like the
outside and the
outside like the
inside, and the
above like the
below, and when
you make the
male and the
female one and
the same, so
that the male
not be male nor
the female
female; ...then
will you enter
the kingdom."
And the fact
that it is
easily
demonstrated
that the
Christians of
the first
century knew and
understood this
requirement that
Jesus set forth
in order to
enter the
Kingdom (see
http://GospelOfThomas.Nazirene.org#GospelEnigma
), demonstrates
that the
corruption of
the Gospels --
which corruption
was necessary in
order to support
the gravely
flawed
foundational
paradigm of
fourth century
Pagan Rome --
has made it
impossible for
the modern
Christian to
understand the
original purpose
and objective of
the Gospels, as
well as to gain
entrance into
the Kingdom.
That the
foregoing
teaching which
is contained in
the Gospel of
Thomas saying 22
was important to
the first
century
followers of
Jesus, is
demonstrated in
The Second
Epistle of
Clement where
this
ultra-important
teaching that
was removed from
the Gospels
modern
Christians use
is quoted as
stating:
“Let us
expect,
therefore, hour
by hour, the
kingdom of God
in love and
righteousness,
since we know
not the day of
the appearing of
God. For the
Lord Himself,
being asked by
one when His
kingdom would
come, replied,
'When two shall
be one, that
which is without
as that which is
within, and the
male with the
female, neither
male nor
female’”.
What Clement --
the disciple of
Peter who is
claimed by the
Church as the
fourth pope in
succession of
Peter -- is
stating in
accord with the
Original
teachings, is
that when the
seeker/believer
brings this
condition about
within their own
Mind and Being,
that the
predicted and
expected Kingdom
will come within
them as promised
-- as stated in
Jesus' teachings
on the Key of
Knowledge (see
The End Times -
Armageddon/Rapture
- The Coming Of
The Kingdom
http://TreeOfLife.Nazirene.org#EndTimes
).
It is important
to recognize
that when
Clement wrote
the above words
of Jesus in his
Epistle to a
congregation of
Christians, he
did so in the
expectation that
the people to
whom he was
writing would
understand the
great truths he
was presenting
to them. That
the Kingdom, or
End Times, would
and could only
come when
"...two shall
be one, that
which is without
as that which is
within, and the
male with the
female, neither
male nor
female’”.
And the fact
that this
statement that
is in the Gospel
of Thomas and
was contained in
a first century
Epistle from an
elder to a
congregation of
believers in
that time-frame,
COULD NOT IN ANY
MEASURE be
contained and
understood in a
letter or
epistle to a
congregation
today, is merely
one example of
the fact that
the dogma and
thinking of the
modern Church
has virtually
nothing in
common with the
original
teachings of
Jesus known as
TheWay (see The
Original
Teachings Have
Nothing In
Common With
Church Dogma
http://TheCall.Nazirene.org#OriginalTeachings
). Which
provokes the
question: Has
the requirements
to enter the
Kingdom changed
in order to
accommodate the
dogmatic
corruption of
the Church?
Has Truth and
Higher Spiritual
Reality been
discarded and
thrown away,
because the
Church threw
this body of
essential
Knowledge
pertaining to
the Coming of
the Kingdom
away? Or, does
modern
Christians dwell
in a
self-imposed
Diaspora of
abject Spiritual
Ignorance which
was brought
about by the
massive
corruption of
the scriptures
(see
BibleCorruption.com
), and the
suppression of
the body of
essential
knowledge that
is necessary to
restore the lost
prodigal son to
his rightly
place in the
Edenic Kingdom
of Origination.
When Jesus
conveyed to
Nicomedus that
"...Most
assuredly, I say
to you, unless
one is born
again, he cannot
see the kingdom
of God"
-- and when
Nicomedus did
not understand
the threefold
process of
birth, Jesus
then asked how
Nicodemus could be
called a
teacher, and not
know these
spiritual
realities:
"...Nicodemus
answered and
said to Him, How
can these things
be? Jesus
answered and
said to him, Are
you the teacher
of Israel, and
do not know
these things? It
is important to
grasp the
reality of the
words that when
Nicodemus did
not grasp the
reality of
achieving the
next stage of
birth, that
Jesus replied:
Most
assuredly, I say
to you,
We
speak what
We
know and testify
what
We
have seen, and
you do not
receive Our
witness. If I
have told you
earthly things
and you do not
believe, how
will you believe
if I tell you
heavenly
things?"
(John 3:1-12 NKJ).
Thus, if the
next stage of
birth was
brought about by
saying a prayer
to the Jesus-god
created by
fourth century
pagan Rome --
or, the sinners
prayer as is
commonly
practiced by
modern
Christians --
then Jesus would
not have replied
to Nicodemus in
this manner.
He would have
stated to
Nicodemus that a
person must say
the prayer to
the Messianic
Lord and Savior,
in order to be
born again.
But he did not,
because this
man-made dogma
had not yet been
invented and
propagated by
faux-priests who
were part of the
great
shadow-church of
pagan Rome.
Stages Of Birth:
Where the
person's
physical birth
was the first
stage of birth
that each man
and woman
experiences in
order for the
Soul to enter
this world,
there is yet
three (3)
subsequent
stages of birth
that each person
must bring
about, in order
to complete the
journey of the
prodigal son's
return to the
Edenic Kingdom
-- which
abandonment of
the Kingdom by
s/he was invoked
by her/his own
volition.
At
the commencement
of each stage of
birth, the Soul
emerges from the
womb as a male
or female
newborn child.
When a person is
born into this
world though,
the process of
creating an
embryo comprised
of the male and
female essence
(sperm and ovum)
being formed
into a fetus --
with each person
developing in
the womb in
order to be born
into this
present world --
and when rightly
understood, this
world can be
portrayed as the
next stage of
womb (see Mental
Womb
http://OuterDarkness.Nazirene.org#MentalWomb
). What this
means is that
when you were
born into this
realm, you
entered the next
subsequent
(second) womb as
a Cosmic Sperm
(man) or Ovum
(woman) that
must fulfill the
process set
forth in Gospel
of Thomas saying
22, in order to
fully enter the
Kingdom of Man
(see Entering
The Kingdom Of
Man
http://OuterDarkness.Nazirene.org#EnteringTheKingdomOfMan
). Which means
that when you
fulfill the
requirements set
forth in the
words,
"When you
make the two
one, and when
you make the
inside like the
outside and the
outside like the
inside, and the
above like the
below, and when
you make the
male and the
female one and
the same, so
that the male
not be male nor
the female
female",
you will have
prevailed over
your inherent
duality at that
level, and
become a Child
at the next
stage of birth
-- i.e.,
"For there
are some
children, which
were so born
from their
mother's womb;
And there are
some who God
returned, and
were made the
children of men;
And there be
children, who
have made
themselves
children for the
kingdom of
heaven's sake."
Meaning, while
there are some
who are children
by virtue of
being born from
their mother's
womb -- and if
that Soul fails
to achieve the
subsequent
stages of birth,
they are
returned to the
cycle of
physical birth
by the Laws of
God -- and just
as Jesus said
that you must
"turn about"
and become as a
child, there are
the few who make
"...themselves
children for the
kingdom of
heaven's sake".
The Folly Of
Literal/Historical
Interpretations:
The
genealogy of
Jesus in the
Gospel of
Matthew was not
removed ONLY
because the vast
majority of
Christians are
incapable of
understanding
the great truths
that are
presented.
Those who
understand the
meaning of the
numbers will
understand that
the three
subsequent
stages of birth
presented in the
genealogy of
Jesus in the
Gospel of
Matthew, is also
presented in the
parable of the
Sower and the
Seed (see
http://Messianic.Nazirene.org/sower_seed.html
). In the
parable, the initial
soul-generated
image or
personality is
projected into
the body of a
woman at
conception --
and this
projected
soul-image is
the seed that
has been cast
into the earth.
The sperm of the
father
fertilizes the
ovum of the
mother, and the
image of the
pre-existent
Soul of the
child that is to
be born, is
projected into
the embryo that
forms at
conception.
But one of the
most important
aspects of the
parable of the Sower and the
Seed that is not
understood is
presented in the
example of the
seed that was
planted in the
"good ground"
where it states:
"But other
seed fell on
good ground and
yielded a crop
that sprang up,
increased and
produced: some
thirtyfold, some
sixty, and some
a hundred."
What is being
presented is the
subsequent
stages of birth
in the words
"...some
thirtyfold, some
sixty, and some
a hundred."
The term
"thirtyfold"
is
representative
of the next
stage of birth
that enables the
person to become
At-One with
their higher Soul-Self.
The term
"sixtyfold"
is
representative
of the third
stage of birth
that enables the
person to become
At-One with
their
Spiritual-Self.
The term
"a hundred"
is
representative
of the last
stage of birth
that enables the
person to become
At-One with the
Logos/Son of God
(see
http://BrotherOfJesus.org#AtOnement
). Thus,
in each of the
subsequent
stages of birth,
you must
"turn about"
and become a
child of that
kingdom you have
entered through
the process of
birth. At each
level of birth,
you must
"turn about",
and become as a
child or
"little one".
Perhaps one of
the finest
examples of the
organic mind's
attempt to
explain away
from a purely
physical/carnal
perspective what
it should be
investigating,
is demonstrated
in the
genealogies of
Jesus. The fact
that the
genealogy
presented in
Luke is not the
same as that in
Matthew, has
long been the
source of many
dogmatic
theories. But
the fact that
the genealogy in
Matthew contains
four women, and
three
foreigners,
should
immediately send
up a red flag
warning that
these
genealogies
cannot -- and
never were
intended -- to
be read
literally.
Further, two of
the women were
strangers to the
commonwealth of
Israel, Rachab a
Canaanitess, and
a harlot
besides, and
Ruth the
Moabitess. In
the pedigree of
the kings of
Judah, between
Joram and Ozias
(v. 8), there
are three left
out, namely,
Ahaziah, Joash,
and Amaziah --
and therefore
Joram could not
have begat Ozias.
When it is said
(v. 12) that
Jechonias begat
Salathiel, that
Jechonias was
the son of that
Jehoiakim who
was carried into
Babylon, the
scriptures tell
us that
Jechonias was
childless (Jer.
22:30), and in
direct
contradiction to
what is written
in Matthew, it
is written that
“No man of
his seed shall
prosper”.
In order to
insure that the
genealogies
cannot be read
literally, it is
further stated
in Matthew:
“Thus there
were fourteen
generations in
all from Abraham
to David,
fourteen from
David to the
exile to
Babylon, and
fourteen from
the exile to the
Christ”
(Matt 1:17 NIV).
The number
fourteen (14) is
significant,
because it
portrays the Son
of Man in the
Kingdom.
With regard to
the many
problems
presented in the
genealogies, the
Adam Clark
Commentary
writes:
[Josias begat
Jechonias and
his brethren,
about the time
they were
carried away to
Babylon:] There
are three
considerable
difficulties in
this verse.
1. Josias was
not the father
of Jechonias; he
was only the
grandfather of
that prince: (1
Chr. 3:14-16)
2.
Jechonias had no
brethren; at
least, none are
on record.
3. Josias
died 20 years
before the
Babylonian
captivity took
place, and
therefore
Jechonias and
his brethren
could not have
been begotten
about the time
they were
carried away to
Babylon.
To this may be
added a fourth
difficulty,
namely, there
are only
thirteen in this
2nd class of
generations; or
forty-one,
instead of
forty-two, in
the whole.
When rightly
understood, the
number forty-one
instead of
forty-two among
other things
would signify
that the last
stage of birth
was not Complete
-- and the whole
of the Gospel
portrays the
Completion of
the final stage
of birth in the
allegorical
account of the
crucifixion.
While it remains
virtually
impossible to
interpret
the above
genealogy of
Jesus from a
literal/historical
perspective, it
is generally
ignored by most
students of the
scriptures
because they
lack the ability
to uncover the
spiritual
meaning.
The sequence of
the numbers
fourteen,
fourteen and
fourteen,
signifies the
Son of Man as
signified in the
number four, and
personified in
the name of
David.
When we add in
the number ten
which gives us
the number
fourteen, what
we have is the
Son of Man
reigning in the
Kingdom.
And while the
sequence of
fourteen,
fourteen and
fourteen would
signify
achieving the
three subsequent
stages of birth,
the fact that
the numbers
actually present
to us the
sequences of
fourteen,
fourteen and
thirteen,
conveys to us
the necessity to
achieve
Completion and
Perfection in
the final stage
of birth that
the man Jesus
accomplished in
the allegorical
portrayal of the
crucifixion.
And while it is
impossible to
interpret the
genealogy in
Matthew
literally/historically,
alleged biblical
experts are
clueless to
understand not
only the
spiritual
meaning, but
also what the
implications are
in the life of
all of mankind.
If the
historical man
Jesus had to
achieve the
three stages of
birth prior to
his becoming the
Anointed
(Messiah/Christ)
in that life,
then the
question
becomes: When
were these
subsequent
stages of birth
achieved?
Certainly not in
the life as the
man Jesus.
Which means that
the historical
man Jesus lived
many previous
lives where his
Soul evolved to
the degree that
the subsequent
stages of birth
could be
achieved, and
when his Soul
entered the life
of Jesus, he was
only then able
to achieve
Completion,
Wholeness and
Total
Perfection.
But this raises
the
ultra-important
question that,
if the Soul of
the historical
man Jesus lived
many lives in
this world in
order to achieve
the necessary
subsequent
stages of birth,
which enabled
him to become
At-One With The
Logos/Son Of God
(see
http://BrotherOfJesus.org#AtOnement
).
And if it is
true that the
Soul of the
historical man
Jesus evolved to
the perfection
over the course
of many
lifetimes, this
would indicate
that all of
mankind is
presently
evolving to this
same level of
perfection as
presented at
Matthew 5:48
which sets forth
the requirement:
"You
therefore must
be perfect, as
your heavenly
Father is
perfect".
If
each Soul must
achieve the same
level of
perfection that
the historical
man Jesus did,
then each Soul
will have to
achieve this
perfection over
the course of
many lifetimes.
By achieving the
subsequent
stages of birth
the person
receives the
Divine Manna or
Sacred Knowledge
of the Kingdom
-- i.e.,
"To him who
overcomes will I
give to eat of
the hidden
manna"
(Rev 2:8-17).
And it is this
Spiritual
Nourishment or
Divine Manna that
neither the
Gentiles or the
Jews could
receive
(see The Divine
Manna - The
Gospels - The
foundation of
the New Covenant
http://BrotherOfJesus.org#NewCovenant
) of the Kingdom
that only those
who reject the
teachers and
authorities of
this world and
seek inwardly
can receive.
Why? Because
their beliefs
act as obstacles
to their higher
development of
mind and
spirit. Unless
they understand
that within them
is the True
Source of
Knowledge that
they must seek,
they will be
functioning in
an Old Covenant
Mode -- even
when they read
the New
Testament.
Further, because
of the removal
of a number of
key teachings
from the
Gospels, the
lack of this
self-knowledge
has flat-lined
those who seek
the knowledge
and wisdom of
this world in an
Old Covenant
mode of thinking
and teaching.
Jesus said to
Nicodemus that
you must be born
again to enter
the Kingdom. In
order to
demonstrate this
reality, lets
quote the
account of
Nicodemus from
the
Gospel of the
Nazirenes
instead of the
Gospel of John
where this
ultra-important
teaching has
been removed
from the
canonical
Gospels by the
Gentile Church.
Thus, in the
Gospel Of the
Nazirenes we can
see preserved
the more
complete
interaction with
Nicodemus on the
need to be born
again to enter
the Kingdom
which is
presented in the
37th Chapter:
"Jesus sat in
the porch of the
temple, and some
came to learn
His doctrine,
and one said to
Him, Master,
what do you
teach concerning
life? And He
said to them,
Blessed are they
who suffer many
experiences, for
they will be
made perfect
through
suffering; they
will be as the
angels of God in
heaven and will
die no more.
Neither will
they be born any
more, for death
and birth have
no more dominion
over them. They
who have
suffered and
have overcome
will be made
pillars of the
temple of my
God, and they
will go out no
more.
I say to you,
except you be
born again of
water and of
fire, you cannot
see the kingdom
of God. And a
certain Rabbi,
Nicodemus, came
to Him by night
for fear of the
Jews, and said
to Him, How can
a man be born
again when he is
old? Can he
enter a second
time into his
mother's womb
and be born
again? Jesus
answered Except
a man be born
again of flesh
and of spirit,
he can not enter
into the kingdom
of God. The wind
blows where it
lists, and you
hear the sound
of it, but can
not tell from
where it comes
or to where it
goes. The light
shines from the
East even to the
West; out of the
darkness. The
sun rises and
sets into
darkness again;
so is it with
man, from the
ages to the
ages. When it
cometh from the
darkness, it is
that he has
lived before,
and when it goes
down again into
darkness, it is
that he may rest
for a little,
and there after
again exist. So
through many
changes must you
be made perfect,
as it is written
in the book of
Job,
'I am a
wanderer,
changing place
after place and
house after
house, until I
come into the
city and mansion
which is eternal.
And Nicodemus
said to him, How
can these things
be? And Jesus
answered , You
are a teacher in
Israel, and do
not understand
these things?
Truly, we speak
that which we
know, and bear
witness to that
which we have
seen, and you do
not receive our
witness. If I
tell you of
earthly things,
and you do not
believe, how
will you believe
if I tell you of
heavenly things?
No one ascends
into heaven,
unless they
descended out of
heaven, even the
son or daughter
of man which is
in Heaven."
If it is true
that each person
is
"...a wanderer,
changing place
after place and
house after
house, until I
come into the
city and mansion
which is
eternal",
then each Soul
is returned back
into this life
if they fail to
achieve the
subsequent
stages of birth
that is
necessary for
the prodigal
sons and
daughters to
return to the
Edenic Kingdom
of
Origination.
On page 220 of
the book,
Fragments Of A
Faith Forgotten
by GRS Mead, he
quotes the
Septuagint and
writes:
"Job ii. 9:
And I am a
wanderer,
changing place
after place and
house after
house. The...
passage is found
in the version
of the Seventy,
but is omitted
in the English
translation."
Why is this
passage deleted
in the English
translation?
That this saying
is authentic is
demonstrated in
the fact that it
is quoted by the
Church Father
Hippolytus in
his Refutation
of All Heresies,
Bk VIII, 3,
where he writes:
"And that
these things are
so, says (the
Docetic), it is
possible also to
perceive from
Job, when he
uses the
following words:
"And I am a
wanderer,
changing both
place after
place, and house
after house.'"
What does it
mean that
"I am a
wanderer,
changing place
after place and
house after
house, until I
come into the
city and mansion
which is eternal."
Especially since
it appears that
those who
function in and
Old Covenant
Mode and walk
the broad-way of
destruction,
cannot bring
about the
necessary
subsequent stages
of birth. It
is therefore
imperative to
understand that
the word
translated
"destruction",
in no manner
represents what
is actually
being presented
by the
interpreters of
the Greek
biblical
texts. Quoting
the footnote on
this word in the
Schofield
Reference Bible
which reads:
“There is no
thought in these
various words of
annihilation but
of something
that is ruined
and thus
unsuitable or
unable to
fulfill its
original
purpose”.
Which
demonstrates the
validity of the
statement by the
Church Father
Origen who
wrote:
“Every
soul... comes
into this world
strengthened by
the victories or
weakened by the
defeats of its
previous life”
(Origen, De
Principiis).
Which confirms
that statement:
"Do not be
deceived, God is
not mocked; for
whatever a man
sows, that he
will also reap"
(Gal 6:7 NKJ).
And of
interesting note
is the statement
by The
Hastings-Scribner
Dictionary Of
The Bible (New
York, 1903. Bk
4, p. 63) which
proclaimed that
"To affirm
that Jews in
Christ's time
did not believe
in pre-existence
is simply
incorrect". Which
is why the
disciples of
Jesus ask the
question:
"The disciples
of Jesus were
persuaded that a
man might have
sinned before he
was born, (John,
ix. 2,) and the
Pharisees held
the
transmigration
[reincarnation]
of virtuous
souls, (Joseph.
de Bell. Judaico,
l. ii. c. 7;)
and a modern
Rabbi is
modestly
assured, that
Hermes,
Pythagoras,
Plato, etc.,
derived their
metaphysics from
his illustrious
countrymen"
(Gibbon; Decline
& Fall).
What is being
made reference
to is the
question asked
of Jesus about
blindness:
"Now as Jesus
passed by, He
saw a man who
was blind from
birth. And His
disciples asked
Him, saying,
'Rabbi, who
sinned, this man
or his parents,
that he was born
blind?'" (John
9:1-2). In the
Gospel of the
Nazirenes this
same verse
reads:
"And at
another time as
Jesus passed by,
he saw a man who
was blind from
his birth. And
his disciples
asked him
saying, Master,
who did sin,
this man, or his
parents, that he
was born
blind? Jesus
answered, To
what importance
is it whether
this man or his
parents sinned?
The rewards of
our actions
return again to
us so that the
works of the
Lord are made
manifest."
How are the
works of the
Lord made
manifest?
Again, in the
Gospel of the
Nazirenes it is
explained:
"As in Adam
all are bound to
cycles of
rebirth, so in
the Messiah
shall all be
made alive.
Blessed are the
dead who die in
me, and are made
perfect in my
image and
likeness, for
they rest from
their labors and
their works do
follow them.
They have
overcome evil,
and are made
pillars in the
temple of my
God, and they go
out no more, for
they rest in the
eternal. For
them that
persist in evil
there is no
rest, but they
go out and in,
and suffer
correction for
ages, till they
are made
perfect. But for
them that have
done good and
attained to
perfection,
there is endless
rest and they go
into life
everlasting.
They rest in the
eternal. Over
them the
repeated death
and birth have
no power, for
them the wheel
of the eternal
revolves no
more, for they
have attained to
the center,
where is eternal
rest, and the
center of all
things is God."
In the question
presented to
Jesus -- i.e.,
"Rabbi, who
sinned, this man
or his parents",
a reality that
the modern
Christian does
not at all
understand is
the fact that
the Gospels
portray three
reasons for
people being
born blind from
birth -- i.e.,
(1)
the sins
committed in the
Soul's previous
lives;
(2)
the sins
committed by the
parents;
(3)
and the inherent
blindness as a
condition
affecting all of
organic
"natural"
man when his/her
development has
been derailed
(see
Arrested Mental
Development
). Basically,
all the people
who function in
an Old Covent
Mode and walk
the
"broad-way",
fail to develop
the areas of
mind that enable
them to begin to
tap into the
inner Source of
Knowledge, and
therefore their
development of
mind is
derailed. Jesus
portrayed the
Pharisees as
"blind
guides",
because their
thinking,
mindset,
religious
framework of
thinking and
their lifestyle
inhibited their
higher
development.
Because of their
inherent organic
blindness, they
saw only the
literal text of
the scriptures
that Paul
portrayed as the
"letter that
killeth [and]
Jewish
folktales"
(see 2 Cor 3:6;
Titus 1:14) --
unable to
perceive or
comprehend the
inner spiritual
meaning of the
scriptures.
And Jesus made
note of this
condition of
organic
blindness when
he stated to the
Jewish leaders:
"Why do you
see the speck
that is in your
brother's eye,
but do not
notice the log
that is in your
own eye? Or how
can you say to
your brother,
'Let me take the
speck out of
your eye,' when
there is the log
in your own eye?
You hypocrite,
first take the
log out of your
own eye, and
then you will
see clearly to
take the speck
out of your
brother's eye"
(Matt
7:3-5).
What is not at
all understood
is the fact that
Organic
Blindness is the
normal
undeveloped
embryonic mental
condition of
mind. And what
this means is
that because of
undeveloped
immaturity, all
of mankind are
born blind to
their own higher
Soul and
Spiritual
Reality. All of
mankind remains
blind, so long
as they are
functioning in
an Old Covenant
Mode and as what
Jesus portrays
as
"dogs"
("do
not give what is
holy to dogs"), seek their
knowledge from
the authorities
and wisdom of
the outer world
-- thereby,
rejecting the
New Covenant
mode that
enables the mind
to develop
beyond organic
human levels of
limited
consciousness.
And as the mind
of man matures
and evolves to a
condition of
Wholeness--
i.e.,
They that are
whole have no
need of the
physician, but
they that are
sick: I came not
to call the
righteous, but
sinners to
repentance"
(Mark 2:17) --
the fullness of
perceptive-vision
and enlightened
understanding
will come --
unless the
process of
developmental-maturity
of mind and
consciousness is
derailed by
mental obstacles
and/or a carnal
lifestyle
immersed in the
ways and
thinking of this
world (see
Spiritual
Amnesia
http://AnInconvenientTruth.org#SpiritualAmnesia
).
Another
ultra-important
teaching that
was removed from
the canonical
Gospels has been
preserved at
Gospel of Thomas
saying 84 which
reads:
"Jesus said,
When you see
your likeness,
you rejoice"
--
and it is this
likeness that is
our own source
of Being -- our
soul-self, who
is the Being of
Light in the
Near Death
Experience. And
the Gospel of
Thomas asks the
question:
"...But when
you see your
images which
came into being
before you, and
which neither
die nor become
manifest, how
much you will
have to bear!"
These images
which came into
being before
you, are the
past lives that
your soul-self
has previously
lived, that have
all failed to
bring about the
next stage of
soul-birth that
Jesus taught was
necessary to
enter the
Kingdom. And
thus, these past
images which
your Soul and
True-Self has
lived, remain
within the House
of the Soul as
the experiences
of failed lives
that never
became
manifest.
Which means that
as a
failed-image,
you will neither
go to Glory with
God, nor will
you reincarnate
-- and lacking
the permanence
of the Soul, you
will remain
forever as an
experience in
the House of the
Soul.
The reality of
man’s plight in
this world is
that he is an
embryonic image
of his
pre-existent
soul that has
entered into
this realm in
order to perfect
those laws and
elements that he
must overcome.
In the same way
that a fetus is
an embryonic
copy of its
parents, our
mind is an
embryonic image
of our soul.
In the same way
a fetus must
grow and mature
in accordance
with the pattern
of its parents,
our mind must
grow and mature
in the pattern
of our soul.
When our mind
grows in the
culture of this
world, and
becomes
alienated from
our soul, then
our life becomes
synonymous with
the miscarriage
of a fetus whose
defect fails to
develop it in
accordance with
its physical
genetic
pattern. What
this means is
that the
Original
Teaching on the
pre-existent
Soul that
evolves to
Completion over
the course of
many
incarnations,
has virtually
little in common
with the Eastern
doctrine of
reincarnation.
But the fact
that the failed
images of the
Soul that did
not become
"manifest",
continue to
dwell as a
sub-personality
within the House
of the Soul,
means that both
doctrines must
be recognized as
"entry-level",
and both are
misconceptions
of a higher
reality that
"natural"
man in his
organic
condition of
mind, is
incapable of
comprehending.
The Higher
Reality of the
Soul that Paul
warns is
incomprehensible
from an organic
condition of
mind, is
explored at
http://SoulSelf.org
.
What this means
is that the vast
majority of
people don't
remember the
previous lives
their Soul has
lived, because
the soul-image
that they are in
the present,
never lived
those previous
lives. Why
does the Soul
generate images
into this world
at conception?
Because the Soul
is a
twelve-dimensional
Being of Light (
http://BeingOfLight.com
) that cannot
directly
incarnate into
this
three-dimensional
realm or
earthly-womb.
In much the same
way, Creator-God
cannot directly
incarnate into
this world,
because the
dimensions
within the Mind
of God are
Infinite. In
order to
manifest in this
world, the
soul-generated
image must bring
about the next
stage of birth
that would make
the person
At-One with
their
Soul-Self. And
in order for God
to manifest in
this world, a
Soul the
Spiritual
Stature of Jesus
must achieve the
third-stage of
birth that
enabled him to
become At-One
with the Logos (aks
Son of God and
True Prophet)
which
Spiritual-Birth
is explored at
At-Onement
With The
Logos/Son Of God
http://BrotherOfJesus.org#AtOnement
.
Within
the Higher
Reality of the
Soul, all the
previous
incarnations
that are
portrayed as
soul-images in
the Gospel of
Thomas, continue
to live and
dwell within the
House or
Mind-Matrix of
the Soul (see
The
Matrix Of
Soul-Mind
http://TreeOfLife.Nazirene.org#MatrixOfMind
). In the words
of St. Teresa:
"The soul is
as
a castle made of
a single
diamond… in
which there are
many rooms, just
as in Heaven
there are many
mansions”
(Interior Castle
by St. Teresa of
Avila). When
rightly
understood, each
soul-generated
image must
return to their
Source in the
Higher Realty of
the Soul. What
this means is
that the higher
Soul-Self
generates
embryonic images
at the
conception of
the body -- and
these
soul-images then
begin the
process of
evolving through
the levels and
stages of birth
that Jesus
portrayed in the
words:
"...Most
assuredly, I say
to you, unless
one is born
again, he cannot
see the kingdom
of God"
-- means that
those
soul-images
that, after
emerging out of
the physical
womb of their
mother, and into
the environment
of this world,
have begun the
next phase
necessary in
order to bring
about the next
stage of
birth. That
you are a
thought-image
which has been
generated by
your higher
soul-self --
i.e., you exist
as a projected
embryonic
seed-image which
has been
impressed into
the physical
body at
conception --
is the reason
why Paul and the
earliest of
biblical texts
warn that carnal
man is not even
"known by
God"
(see
Soul-Image).
Therefore, you
exist as a
Creation of God
only by proxy --
and by virtue of
the fact that
you are a
thought
projected by
your soul -- and
it was your soul
that was Created
by God in the
beginning. And
thus, the
reality of the
words to Know
Thyself -- and a
house that is
divided, cannot
stand.
With respect to
The Two Ways as
taught in the
words:
"Enter by the
narrow gate; for
wide is the gate
and broad is the
way that leads
to destruction,
and there are
many who go in
by it. Because
narrow is the
gate and
difficult is the
way which leads
to life, and
there are few
who find it"
(Matt
7:13-14 NKJ) --
it is imperative
to understand
that the word
translated
"destruction",
in no manner
represents what
is actually
being presented
by the
interpreters of
the Greek
biblical
texts. Quoting
the footnote on
this word in the
Schofield
Reference Bible
which reads:
“There is no
thought in these
various words of
annihilation but
of something
that is ruined
and thus
unsuitable or
unable to
fulfill its
original
purpose”.
That the higher
soul-self
generates
embryonic images
at the
conception of
the body -- and
these
soul-images then
begin the
process of
evolving through
the levels and
stages of birth
that Jesus
portrayed in the
words:
"...Most
assuredly, I say
to you, unless
one is born
again, he cannot
see the kingdom
of God"
-- means that
those
soul-images
that, after
emerging out of
the physical
womb of their
mother, and into
the environment
of this world,
have begun the
next phase
necessary in
order to bring
about the next
stage of
birth. That
you are a
thought-image
which has been
generated by
your higher
soul-self --
i.e., you exist
as a projected
embryonic
seed-image which
has been
impressed into
the physical
body at
conception --
is the reason
why Paul and the
earliest of
biblical texts
warn that carnal
man is not even
"known by
God"
(see
Soul-Image).
Therefore, you
exist as a
Creation of God
only by proxy --
and by virtue of
the fact that
you are a
thought
projected by
your soul -- and
it was your soul
that was Created
by God in the
beginning. And
thus, the
reality of the
words to Know
Thyself -- and a
house that is
divided, cannot
stand.
That for
countless
reasons these
soul-images
which enter this
world in the
bodies of man
and woman mostly
fail to bring
about the
objective of
achieving the
next stage of
birth that Jesus
said was
absolutely
necessary to
achieve
permanence in
Life, is very
much true that
they have become
as portrayed in
the Schofield
Reference Bible
as being
"...ruined
and thus
unsuitable or
unable to
fulfill its
original
purpose”.
As soul-images
that failed to
evolve through
the next stage
of birth, they
are for the most
part temporal --
being temporal,
they can never
reincarnate as
many in the New
Age believe --
and neither can
they go to Glory
as the Church
promotes. The
fact that some
people claim to
see their past
lives, have been
deceived when
they mistakenly
believe that
they lived those
lives, and the
memory has been
suppressed.
What they are in
effect seeing,
is the images
which their
higher soul-self
has previously
generated --
failed images
which is the
Gospel of Thomas
saying 84 are
portrayed in the
words that
"...when you
see your images
which came into
being before
you, and which
neither die nor
become manifest,
how much you
will have to
bear!"
And these failed
images which
walked (what
Jesus portrayed
as) the
broad-way of
self destruction
-- i.e.,
"...ruined
and thus
unsuitable or
unable to
fulfill its
original
purpose”
-- neither
reincarnate, nor
go to Glory in
the Christian
sense of the
understanding --
and yet, they
remain within
the higher
reality of the
soul in that
dimension of
mind which man,
in his very
limited
understanding,
calls time (see
The Enigma Of
Time And The
Soul Of Man).
The Folly Of
Collective
Salvation And
Social Justice:
The Bottom Line
On The
Scriptures:
If it is true
that the
original Hebrew
Gospels and more
pure Greek
copies are long
gone, then what
good is the
above?
Because of the
importance of
the Original
Gospels, there
presently exist
a number of
source where
more pure copies
are available as
explored at Can
I Get An
Original Pure
Copy Of The
Scriptures
http://OriginalGospel.Ebionite.com#PureCopyOfScriptures
.
These more pure
spiritual copies
of the Gospels
were set aside
and preserved
for when there
would come a
time when the
body of
believers would
understand the
value of the
scriptures, and
desire to
properly embrace
them.
The Indwelling
Logos/Son of
God/True Prophet
desires you to
enter in through
the "narrow
strait gate",
and gain
entrance into
the Spiritual
Bridal Chamber,
where you can
fulfill the
purpose of the
Gospels and be
United and
At-One with the
Indwelling Logos
(see At-Onement
With The
Logos/Son Of God
http://BrotherOfJesus.org#AtOnement
) -- thereby
enabling you to
be nourished by
the Divine Manna
(see The Divine
Manna - The
Gospels - The
foundation of
the New Covenant
http://BrotherOfJesus.org#NewCovenant
). And
these Libraries
of scriptures
were set aside
for when the
people truly
desired to
prevail over the
ignorance of
this world.
In addition to
the remaining
five (5)
libraries of
scriptures that
have yet to be
rediscovered, I
was shown that
if the
congregation of
believers begin
to demand the
release of these
scriptures from
the Vatican
archives, more
pure copies will
be delivered to
the people.
In the meantime,
if a husband and
wife were to
embrace the
concepts set
forth in the
article at
http://TreeOfLife.Nazirene.org
, they would by
virtue of the
Natural Laws of
Creation begin
to open the
inner
"narrow
strait gate"
that provides
entrance into
the Inner Edenic
Kingdom.
Even during the
darkest times on
earth, the
sincere seeker
has never been
abandoned in
this
shadow-world.
Who Is Allan
Cronshaw?
The Soul of
Allan Cronshaw
has lived
countless lives
in every epoch
of time since
the Alpha of
Creation.
In the same way
that the Soul
who lived as the
historical man
Jesus fulfilled
the Royal Law
within himself
-- thereby
enabling him to
become At-One
with the Logos
(Mind of God -
aka Son of
God/True
Prophet) -- the
disciples of
Jesus were part
of a group of
serious seekers
of Truth and
Light that to
varying degrees
fulfilled the
Royal Law within
their own mind
and being (see
http://OriginalGospel.Ebionite.com#Ebionite
).
In the article
The Original
Gospel (
http://OriginalGospel.Ebionite.com
), I prove with
supporting facts
that the Gospel
emerged out of
the foundation
of the Essenes.
I know this for
a provable fact,
because in that
life my Soul
lived as Jacob
who they call
James, the
Brother of
Yeshua who they
call Jesus, and
in that life I
authored the
Original Core
Gospel that was
written in
Biblical Hebrew
Characters (see
The Original
Spiritual
Language Of The
Gospels
http://OriginalGospel.Ebionite.com#OriginalLanguage
). Why were the
Original Gospels
composed in
Biblical Hebrew
Characters?
Because this was
and is a Living
Language that
can invoke a
true and genuine
spiritual
intercession in
the life of the
sincere seeker
-- which cannot
be brought about
in either the
Masoretic Text
used by the
Jews, or the
Greek, Latin or
Aramaic
languages used
by the
Gentiles. When
St. Jerome made
reference to the
original version
of the Gospel
written in
Hebrew
Characters, he
noted that is
was intended to
"...be possessed
by the men most
religious",
meaning those
who had emerged
out of the
Essenes, because
it was too
"secret"
to be given into
the hands of the
Gentile
believers.
In that life,
myself, my
brother Jesus,
as well as John
the Baptist and
other core
disciples of the
New Covenant
movement, all
emerged out of
the
Essenes
(healers;
spiritual
physicians).
And as spiritual
healers and
physicians, we
assisted seekers
to overcome
their inherent
human blindness
-- thereby
restoring the
memory of the
lost prodigal
sons and
daughters (see
Spiritual
Amnesia
http://AnInconvenientTruth.org#SpiritualAmnesia
). And we did
this by
assisting
sincere seekers
in their quest
to achieve
Wholeness --
i.e.,
"They that
are whole have
no need of the
physician, but
they that are
sick: I came not
to call the
righteous, but
sinners to
repentance"
(Mark 2:17).
The Jews were
portrayed as
blind guides --
i.e.,
"Let them
alone: they are
blind leaders of
the blind. And
if the blind
lead the blind,
both shall fall
into the ditch"
(Matt 15:14) --
and they were
blind because
they lacked the
necessary
Wholeness to see
beyond the
shadow-images of
the
Outer Darkness
of the organic
human condition
that plagues all
of mankind who
have yet to
evolve beyond
the
developmental
stages of mental
and spiritual
immaturity. And
like the
Pharisees who
Jesus condemned
as blind guides
-- i.e.,
"Woe to you,
teachers of the
law and
Pharisees, you
hypocrites! You
shut the kingdom
of heaven in
men's faces. You
yourselves do
not enter, nor
will you let
those enter who
are trying to"
(Matt 23:13 NIV),
the modern
Church has
embrace the
doctrines of
spiritually
disenfranchised
carnal men. But
in man's quest
for truth, the
most important
question is to
understand why
Jesus condemned
the leaders of
the Jews as
blind-guide
hypocrites?
Because the
objective of the
scriptures was
to cure the
condition of
inherent human
blindness, and
enable seekers
to enter the
Inner Kingdom
(see
The Fatal Error
Of The Church)
-- and in their
failure to use
the scriptures
as the
Key of Knowledge
(
http://KeyOfKnowledge.org
) that unlocks
the Inner Narrow
Gate that
provides
entrance into
the Kingdom,
both the Jews
and the modern
Christian clergy
are blind
guides:
"They are
blind guides
leading the
blind, and if
one blind person
guides another,
they will both
fall into a
ditch"
(Matt 15:14).
That those who
fail to become
Whole, and first
enter the Inner
Kingdom
themselves --
and thus, remain
blind guides, is
why the Gospel
account of Jesus
states:
"How can you
say to your
brother, ‘Let me
take the speck
out of your
eye,’ while
there is still a
beam in your own
eye? You
hypocrite! First
take the beam
out of your own
eye, and then
you will see
clearly to
remove the speck
from your
brother’s eye"
(Matt 7:4-5).
The Gospels
portray three
causes of
blindness (see
Soul-Evolution -
Reincarnation
And
Soul-Development
http://OriginalGospel.Ebionite.com#SoulEvolution
) -- i.e.,
(1)
born blind
because of the
sins committed
in that Soul's
previous lives
-- and having
been case into
The Prison,
they were warned
that
“Thou shalt
by no means come
out from there,
till thou hast
paid the
uttermost
farthing”
(Mat 5:26);
(2)
born blind
because of the
sin of that
Soul's parents;
and
(3)
being born blind
because of the
limitations of
human
consciousness
which is the
reason why the
biblical authors
all attest to
the fact that
the faith-based
baptized and
committed
(Christian)
believers were
incapable of
comprehending
the true
spiritual
meaning of the
Gospel
teachings.
It is impossible
for the modern
Christian to
understand how a
soul can be cast
into the prison
until which time
they have
"...paid
[back] the
uttermost
farthing”,
because they
believe in
accord with the
doctrines of
Roman Emperors.
In the article I
prove that the
Essenes, the
Pharisees, and
the original
disciples of
Jesus, all
believed in the
pre-existent
soul that
evolves to
Completion and
Perfection over
the course of
many lifetimes.
And when Jesus
stated at
Matthew 5:48
that
"You must
therefore be
perfect, as your
Heavenly Father
is perfect",
the Soul of the
man Jesus
himself had
achieved
Wholeness and
Perfection over
the course of
many
lifetimes.
Jesus said that
you must be born
again to enter
the Kingdom --
and in the same
way that a fetus
who has yet to
immerge out of
its mother's
womb is blind to
the higher
reality of life
in this world,
this world is
the secondary
womb of
Mother-God (see
Mental Womb
http://OuterDarkness.Nazirene.org#MentalWomb
) -- and like
the fetus prior
to physical
birth, all of
mankind is born
blind to the
higher reality
of their own
Soul. And the
primary purpose
and objective of
the Original
Gospels, was to
bring about the
necessary
Wholeness that
as the prodigal
sons and
daughters of
your Heavenly
Father, cures
both your
inherent human
blindness and
restores your
Soul-Memory
caused by the
human condition
of
Spiritual
Amnesia (
http://AnInconvenientTruth.org#SpiritualAmnesia
).
In the article
the
Original Gospel,
I prove that it
was never
intended for the
Gospels to be
read literally
-- as if they
are an
historical
account. I
demonstrate that
the author's of
the Gospels
intentionally
inserted events
that did not
happen and could
not have
happened. I
demonstrate that
there is no
linear or
historical
connection to
the Jews and the
Old Testament,
which scriptures
were authored by
the Essenes and
Spiritual
Essenic people
as an outreach
program intended
to assist the
nomadic tribe of
animal-sacrificing
and heathen
Jews. And in
the same way
that scriptures
such as the
Torah was
composed in
order to
accommodate the
nomadic tribe of
Jews, the copies
of the Gospels
that were
written in Greek
and other
languages, were
basically less
spiritual copies
that were given
to the Gentiles
as a similar
outreach program
by the Ebionite
Nazirenes. As
the prodigal
sons and
daughters, your
Heavenly Father
desires your
return to the
Edenic Kingdom
that you
abandoned to
travel into
this, the Far
Country. The
Original Gospels
were written in
order to enable
you to travail
in TheWay, and
return to the
Kingdom while
you are still
physically alive
in the body. In
the article (Original
Gospel) I
reveal to the
reader how to
acquire an
original copy of
the Gospels --
how it must be
used as the Key
of Knowledge
that has the
power to
transform the
mind and enable
you to be
Anointed by the
Holy Spirit --
and why the
Church has been
inhibiting you
from possessing
the Authentic
Gospels.